T
T
T
Fire Study - Research Project Summary

Early postfire effects of a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians

Written
August, 2007
Study Authors
Elliott et al.
Contributors
Corey Gucker - 1st Compiler
Fire Study Type
Research Project Summary

Gucker, Corey L, comp. 2007. Early postfire effects of a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians of North Carolina. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/fire-studies/elliott-et-al-2007

Source

Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this Research Project Summary comes from the following paper:

  • Elliott, Katherine J.; Hendrick, Ronald L.; Major, Amy E.; Vose, James M.; Swank, Wayne T. 1999. Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management. 114(2-3): 199-213 [1].

Species Included in the Summary

Common names are used throughout this summary. For a complete list of the common and scientific names of species discussed in this summary, see the Appendix.

Fire effects were studied in the Wine Spring Creek Watershed in the southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina's Nantahala National Forest (35 °N latitude, 83 °W longitude).

Site Description

The prescribed fire burned a south-facing slope of 35% to 60% at 1,500 to 1,700 m elevation. Fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludult and loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Dystrochrept soils occur at the upper slope and ridge. Coarse-loamy to loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Haplumbrept soils occur at the mid- and low-slope positions. Annual temperature and precipitation in this area average 10.4 °C and 1,900 mm, respectively.

At the low-slope position, researchers described the vegetation as a mesic, near-riparian community. Overstory dominants were red maple and hickory. Midslope supported a dry, mixed-oak community dominated by chestnut oak, scarlet oak, red maple, hickory, and sourwood. Ridges and upper slopes were xeric pitch pine/chestnut oak forests. Communities had not burned for at least 70 years prior to this prescribed fire.

Historic fire regime characteristics for Appalachian oak-hickory-pine and eastern dry oak communities are summarized below:

Fire regime information on the vegetation community studied in this Research Project Summary. Fire regime characteristics are taken from the LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Vegetation Model [3]. This vegetation model was developed by local experts using available literature and expert opinion.
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group)Fire severity*Fire regime characteristics
Percent of firesMean interval (years)Minimum interval (years)Maximum interval (years)
Appalachian oak-hickory-pineReplacement3%18030500
Mixed8%6515150
Surface or low89%6310
Oak (eastern dry-xeric)Replacement6%12850100
Mixed16%502030
Surface or low78%10110

*Fire Severities:

Replacement=Any fire that causes greater than 75% top removal of a vegetation-fuel type, resulting in general replacement of existing vegetation; may or may not cause a lethal effect on the plants.

Surface or low=Any fire that causes less than 25% upper layer replacement and/or removal in a vegetation-fuel class but burns 5% or more of the area.

Mixed=Any fire burning more than 5% of an area that does not qualify as a replacement, surface, or low-severity fire; includes mosaic and other fires that are intermediate in effects [2,3]. 

Plant Phenology

Phenology of the vegetation was not described prior to the April 1995 prescribed fire; some vegetation may have initiated growth by this time. Without the precise date of the fire and climate conditions in the months prior, it is difficult to describe the phenology of the vegetation as a whole.

The Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, burned this southern slope to promote oak and pitch pine regeneration in the long unburned and "degraded" community. Increased severity was predicted as the fire burned upslope. Researchers hoped that burned sites would have increased forage production, decreased mountain-laurel abundance, and increased pitch pine and oak (Quercus spp.) recruitment.

Strip head fires were used to burn the approximately 300-ha study area. On the ridge, the fire was stand replacing, and the understory was consumed [1,5]. At the low-slope position, the fire was patchy and burned only the understory. Aboveground flame temperatures and heat penetration were measured using heat-sensitive painted tiles. Flame temperatures were measured 1 and 2 m above ground. Belowground heat penetration was measured at the forest floor and in the mineral soil. Temperatures produced and heat penetration depths are summarized below [5].

Above- and belowground temperatures produced by the fire at low, mid-, and ridge positions.
Slope positionFlame temperature (°C)Average (range) of soil heat penetration (mm)
1 m2 m45 °C59 °C
Low slope<52<520.5 (0-3)0.6 (0-4)
Mid-slope<52 to 160<52 to 9018.2 (1-52)16.8 (4-52)
Ridge<52 to >800<52 to >80027.5 (9-55)24.0 (7-55)

Fire Season/Severity Classification

Spring/low to high

Overstory dominance on the ridge was unchanged by the fire. Pitch pine, chestnut oak, and scarlet oak dominated the canopy vegetation both before and after the fire. Density- and basal area-based species richness were significantly (P≤0.05) reduced by the fire. Decreased richness was a result of American chestnut, blackgum, black locust, sassafras, and eastern hemlock mortality. Nearly all canopy species had decreased frequency, density, and basal area after the fire.

Pre- and postfire frequency, density, and basal area of canopy species on the ridge. *Values with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05) between time periods.
Time since fireFrequency (%)Density (stems/ha)Basal area (m²/ha)
Prefire3 moPrefire3 moPrefire3 mo
American chestnut2102900.110
blackgum1402900.170
black locust70700.010
Carolina silverbell77770.150.15
chestnut oak93642391465.223.33
common serviceberry4321109700.970.67
eastern hemlock70700.260
hickory3621128501.380.80
northern red oak211417140.070.07
pitch pine937863744112.459.67
red maple5021108412.141.21
sassafras70300.010
scarlet oak5736121602.261.55
sourwood505096771.601.40
white oak77770.020.02
Total1,545a*913b26.84a18.86b

The average percent mortality following the fire ranged from 18.5% to 30.6% for the dominant overstory species (pitch pine, chestnut oak, and scarlet oak). For associated overstory species, mortality ranged from 25.0% to 100%.

Average mortality of overstory species on burned ridge.
SpeciesNMortality (%)SE
American chestnut31000
chestnut oak1230.613.3
common serviceberry425.025.0
hickory557.517.5
pitch pine1218.58.6
red maple742.820.2
scarlet oak829.216.0

Total density and basal area of understory vegetation on the ridge was significantly (P≤0.05) lower following the fire. However, total density and basal area increased with increased time since fire, although basal area and density had not recovered to prefire levels within a year of the fire. Mountain-laurel density and basal area were significantly (P≤0.05) lower after burning. Pitch pine understory density increased after the first postfire year. Black locust, chestnut oak, and scarlet oak densities were significantly (P≤0.05) greater after the ridge burned. White oak, northern red oak, and black oak were not present in the understory after the fire.

Pre- and postfire frequency, density, and basal area of understory species on the ridge. *Values with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05) between time periods.
Time since fireFrequency (%)Density (stems/ha)Basal area (m²/ha)
Prefire3 mo1 yr, 3 moPrefire3 mo1 yr, 3 moPrefire3 mo1 yr, 3 mo
Understory species (≥1 cm basal diameter, <5 cm DBH)
American chestnut2102195204130.53600.184
black locust1402810b*0813a0.00200.119
black oak360019000.01000
chestnut oak501421505b25c720a0.2440.0240.097
deerberry00700317000.025
common serviceberry367776a6b3b0.0270.0080.001
flame azalea707159a019b0.03800.002
hickory140148201610.02200.025
mountain-laurel10021148,651a248b168b4.97a0.127b0.403b
northern red oak3600368a19b00.1870.0020
pitch pine210716503170.21200.035
red maple43141416813820.0450.0100.011
sassafras36736321b82c571a0.0500.1910.102
scarlet oak50750295b6c1,997a0.078b0.008b0.222a
sourwood70141010290.0010.0010.004
sweet birch0070079000.006
white oak2800397000.09600
Total12,178a409c5,692b6.522a0.371c1.236b

The number of pitch pine seedlings increased by 358% in the third postfire month but was 35% of the prefire number a year following the fire. Common serviceberry seedlings increased by 350% a year after the fire.

The coverage of ground layer vegetation on the ridge slightly exceeded prefire levels by the first postfire year. Black oak, white oak, sourwood, and black locust were present in the prefire surface layer but were not present a year after the fire. Red maple, chestnut oak, and sassafras had greater cover after than before the fire. Blueberry, buffalo nut, mountain sweetpepperbush, and flame azalea all had greater than prefire cover levels 1 year after the fire. Pitch pine, present with low cover in prefire vegetation, was absent from the ground layer after the fire. Most herbs and vines present in the prefire community had increased cover in the first postfire year. Sedge and goldenrod species present in the prefire community, however, were absent from the community a year after fire. Bedstraw, western brackenfern, greater tickseed, common goldstar, bellwort, Michaux's saxifrage, New York fern, plains snakecotton, little bluestem, and panicgrass were only found on the ridge after the fire.

Pre- and postfire cover of herb-layer vegetation on the ridge.
Time since firePrefire3 mo1 year, 3 mo
Ground layer species

Cover (%)

Trees
American chestnut00.70
black locust0.020.50
black oak0.060.080
chestnut oak0.250.101.29
common serviceberry0.060.080.08
northern red oak0.080.080.25
pitch pine0.100.080
red maple0.250.081.17
sassafras0.100.252.88
scarlet oak0.080.030.21
sourwood0.020.50
white oak0.0300
Shrubs
blackberry000.12
black huckleberry1.031.880.96
blueberry2.282.285.17
buffalo nut0.180.080.67
flame azalea0.020.251.46
mountain-laurel (clone density = #/ha)28.03.67 (11,307)11.4 (9,285)
mountain sweetpepperbush0.070.030.96
smooth sumac00.030
Forbs
bedstraw00.131.33
bellwort00.030
common goldstar00.050
beetleweed0.400.100.92
greater tickseed00.050
goldenrod0.0200
Indian cucumber0.0200.12
Michaux's saxifrage00.020.29
narrowleaf cowwheat0.220.021.17
New York fern00.020
plains snakecotton000.12
trailing arbutus0.550.100.33
western brackenfern00.100.42
Graminoids
little bluestem00.230.54
panicgrass002.75
sedge1.080.100
Vines
greenbrier0.630.402.71
Total10.637.7
Species richness243326
Pielou evenness index0.320.610.77

The fire at the midslope position was less severe than that at the ridge. Total pre- and postfire overstory density and basal area were not significantly (P≤0.05) different, and pre- and postfire differences in individual overstory species frequency, density, and basal area were little to none.

Pre- and postfire frequency, density, and basal area of overstory species at the midslope position. *Values with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05) between time periods.
Time since firePrefire3 moPrefire3 moPrefire3 mo
SpeciesFrequency (%)Density (stems/ha)Basal area (m²/ha)
blackgum22221561560.990.99
black locust564489640.660.53
Carolina silverbell111144330.260.23
chestnut oak564499946.476.44
cucumber-tree1111550.040.04
common serviceberry333338380.270.27
eastern hemlock222222220.940.94
hickory67671731782.842.89
red maple2001006266069.019.02
scarlet oak222238274.003.91
sourwood67671531373.163.11
sweet birch2222550.030.03
Total1,448a*1,365a28.69a28.42a

Total density and basal area of midslope vegetation was significantly (P≤0.05) reduced by the fire. Red maple, American chestnut, mountain-laurel, and sourwood had significantly (P≤0.05) lower density and basal area after the fire. Hickory, Carolina silverbell, cucumber-tree, buffalo nut, white oak, black locust, and eastern hemlock were present in the prefire community but were not present 3 months after the fire. Rosebay, a dominant in the prefire understory, remained dominant after the fire with relatively little change in density or basal area after the fire.

Pre- and postfire frequency, density, and basal area of understory species at the midslope position. *Values with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05) between time periods.
Time since firePrefire3 moPrefire3 moPrefire3 mo
Understory species (≥1 cm basal diameter, <0.5 cm DBH)Frequency (%)Density (stems/ha)Basal area (m²/ha)
American chestnut4411573a*20b0.127a0.002b
blackgum1111123a10b0.012a0.012a
black locust1101500.0080
buffalo nut11012300.0470
Carolina silverbell22049400.0640
chestnut oak11112550.012<0.001
cucumber-tree11012300.0190
eastern hemlock1101000.0020
hickory110500.0060
mountain-laurel67114,691a123b4.497a0.422b
northern red oak2202000.0100
red maple5622326a15b0.494a0.019a
rosebay22111,605a1,358a7.231a7.789a
sourwood2211138a25b0.015a0.002b
white oak22024700.0200
Total8,518a1,556b12.56a8.25b

The fire at the low-slope position was less severe than that at the ridge or midslope. Total pre- and postfire canopy density and basal area were not significantly (P≤0.05) different, and pre- and postfire differences in individual species frequency, density, and basal area were little to none.

Pre- and postfire frequency, density, and basal area of overstory species at the low-slope position. *Values with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05) between time periods.
Time since firePrefire3 moPrefire3 moPrefire3 mo
SpeciesFrequency (%)Density (stems/ha)Basal area (m²/ha)
American chestnut111111110.0010.001
American witchhazel111111110.020.02
blackgum111122220.070.07
black locust222222220.940.94
Carolina silverbell221144150.130.05
chestnut oak333332320.630.62
cucumber-tree111130390.160.18
common serviceberry443347370.280.24
eastern hemlock89892382433.803.87
hickory78781861676.646.62
northern red oak333321210.610.63
red maple89893333286.546.59
sassafras1111550.070.07
scarlet oak333321213.123.16
sugar maple1111550.040.04
sourwood111122220.780.78
striped maple444464640.490.50
white oak222236362.882.90
tuliptree222215150.480.51
Total1,167a*1,117a27.72a27.82a

The low-severity fire at the low slope increased total understory stem density, though not significantly. Hawthorn, which was not present before the fire, had a density of 123 stems/ha 3 months after the fire. Postfire densities of American chestnut, white ash, Carolina silverbell, and buffalo nut were more than double the prefire densities 3 months after spring burning. Densities of flame azalea, eastern hemlock, northern red oak, and hickory decreased by more than half, and mountain magnolia and chestnut oak were absent after the fire.

Pre- and postfire frequency, density, and basal area of canopy species at the low-slope position. *Values with the same letters are not significantly different (P≤0.05) between time periods.
Time since firePrefire3 moPrefire3 moPrefire3 mo
Understory species (≥1 cm basal diameter, <0.5 cm DBH)Frequency (%)Density (stems/ha)Basal area (m²/ha)
American chestnut33441385920.0440.115
buffalo nut11331233700.0510.135
Carolina silverbell3333591380.0220.031
chestnut oak11050<0.0010
cucumber-tree33442073010.0560.074
common serviceberry332230540.0160.037
eastern hemlock2222143200.40.019
flame azalea11118643700.320.200
hawthorn011012300.014
hickory111140100.0060.007
mountain magnolia11050<0.0010
northern red oak2222133640.0260.005
red maple222230440.0100.021
sugar maple33331381580.0260.032
striped maple22221331530.0180.026
sourwood11115100.002<0.001
sweet birch1111510<0.001<0.001
white ash112215790.0050.017
white oak221110340.0010.003
tuliptree2233691180.0110.020
Total2,153a*2,652a1.015a0.758a
 

This southern slope was burned to encourage oak and pitch pine regeneration in the long unburned and "degraded" community. Researchers hoped that burned sites would have increased forage production and decreased mountain-laurel abundance. On the ridge, the abundance of red maple was reduced by the fire, and growth and recruitment of several oak species increased in the understory. The fire decreased mountain-laurel density and basal area on the ridge and midslope positions. However, without later postfire sampling it is unclear whether or not pitch pine and oak regeneration will be successful before mountain-laurel density and basal area recover to prefire levels. The early mortality of postfire pitch pine seedlings suggests that successful pitch pine regeneration may require another prescribed fire or canopy-opening disturbance. Low postfire precipitation, high postfire basal area, and/or the lack of litter and duff consumption may have increased postfire pitch pine seedling mortality. In the understory, blueberries, black huckleberry, little bluestem, and panicgrasses increased in number, increasing wildlife forage in the area.

While the spring fire in the southern Appalachians increased wildlife forage and encouraged oak regeneration, it did not allow for successful regeneration of pitch pine. A high-severity fire, burning when pitch pine cone crops are good, may produce an environment conducive to successful pitch pine recruitment. Researchers suggest an initial high-severity fire and subsequent low-severity fires at 5- to 10-year intervals may encourage pitch pine and oak dominance and limit mountain-laurel density.

Table A1: Common and scientific names of species mentioned in this summary.

This Research Project Summary contains fire response information on the following species. For further information, search FEIS reviews for listed species.
Common nameScientific name
striped mapleAcer pensylvanicum
red mapleAcer rubrum
sugar mapleAcer saccharum
common serviceberryAmelanchier arborea
sweet birchBetula lenta
sedgeCarex spp.
hickoryCarya spp.
American chestnutCastanea dentata
mountain sweetpepperbushClethra acuminata
greater tickseedCoreopsis major
hawthornCrataegus spp.
trailing arbutusEpigaea repens
white ashFraxinus americana
plains snakecottonFroelichia floridana
beetleweedGalax urceolata
bedstrawGalium spp.
black huckleberryGaylussacia baccata
Carolina silverbellHalesia carolina
American witchhazelHamamelis virginiana
common goldstarHypoxis hirsuta
mountain-laurelKalmia latifolia
tuliptreeLiriodendron tulipifera
cucumber-treeMagnolia acuminata
mountain magnoliaMagnolia fraseri
Indian cucumberMedeola virginiana
narrowleaf cowwheatMelampyrum lineare
blackgumNyssa sylvatica
sourwoodOxydendrum arboreum
panicgrassPanicum spp.
pitch pinePinus rigida
western brackenfernPteridium aquilinum
buffalo nutPyrularia pubera
white oakQuercus alba
scarlet oakQuercus coccinea
chestnut oakQuercus prinus
northern red oakQuercus rubra
black oakQuercus velutina
smooth sumacRhus glabra
flame azaleaRhododendron calendulaceum
rosebayRhododendron maximum
black locustRobinia pseudoacacia
blackberryRubus spp.
sassafrasSassafras albidum
Michaux's saxifrageSaxifraga michauxii
little bluestemSchizachyrium scoparium
greenbrierSmilax spp.
goldenrodSolidago spp.
New York fernThelypteris noveboracensis
eastern hemlockTsuga canadensis
bellwortUvularia spp.
deerberryVaccinium stamineum
blueberryVaccinium spp.

1. Elliott, Katherine J.; Hendrick, Ronald L.; Major, Amy E.; Vose, James M.; Swank, Wayne T. 1999. Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management. 114(2-3): 199-213. [30079]

2. Hann, Wendel; Havlina, Doug; Shlisky, Ayn; [and others]. 2005. Interagency fire regime condition class guidebook. Version 1.2, [Online]. In: Interagency fire regime condition class website. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior; The Nature Conservancy; Systems for Environmental Management (Producer). Variously paginated [+ appendices]. Available: http://www.frcc.gov/docs/1.2.2.2/Complete_Guidebook_V1.2.pdf [2007, May 23]. [66734]

3. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2005. Reference condition modeling manual (Version 2.1), [Online]. In: LANDFIRE. Cooperative Agreement 04-CA-11132543-189. Boulder, CO: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior (Producers). 72 p. Available: http://www.landfire.gov/downloadfile.php?file=RA_Modeling_Manual_v2_1.pdf [2007, May 24]. [66741]

4. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2007. Rapid assessment reference condition models. In: LANDFIRE. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab; U.S. Geological Survey; The Nature Conservancy (Producers). Available: http://www.landfire.gov/models_EW.php [66533]

5. Vose, James M.; Swank, Wayne T.; Clinton, Barton D.; Knoepp, Jennifer D.; Swift, Lloyd W. 1999. Using stand replacement fires to restore southern Appalachian pine-hardwood ecosystems: effects on mass, carbon, and nutrient pools. Forest Ecology and Management. 114(2-3): 215-226. [30149]

Last updated April 27, 2026