Early postfire effects of a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians
Gucker, Corey L, comp. 2007. Early postfire effects of a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians of North Carolina. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/fire-studies/elliott-et-al-2007
Source
Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this Research Project Summary comes from the following paper:
- Elliott, Katherine J.; Hendrick, Ronald L.; Major, Amy E.; Vose, James M.; Swank, Wayne T. 1999. Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management. 114(2-3): 199-213 [1].
Species Included in the Summary
Common names are used throughout this summary. For a complete list of the common and scientific names of species discussed in this summary, see the Appendix.
Fire effects were studied in the Wine Spring Creek Watershed in the southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina's Nantahala National Forest (35 °N latitude, 83 °W longitude).
Site Description
The prescribed fire burned a south-facing slope of 35% to 60% at 1,500 to 1,700 m elevation. Fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludult and loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Dystrochrept soils occur at the upper slope and ridge. Coarse-loamy to loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Haplumbrept soils occur at the mid- and low-slope positions. Annual temperature and precipitation in this area average 10.4 °C and 1,900 mm, respectively.
At the low-slope position, researchers described the vegetation as a mesic, near-riparian community. Overstory dominants were red maple and hickory. Midslope supported a dry, mixed-oak community dominated by chestnut oak, scarlet oak, red maple, hickory, and sourwood. Ridges and upper slopes were xeric pitch pine/chestnut oak forests. Communities had not burned for at least 70 years prior to this prescribed fire.
Historic fire regime characteristics for Appalachian oak-hickory-pine and eastern dry oak communities are summarized below:
| Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) | Fire severity* | Fire regime characteristics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of fires | Mean interval (years) | Minimum interval (years) | Maximum interval (years) | ||
| Appalachian oak-hickory-pine | Replacement | 3% | 180 | 30 | 500 |
| Mixed | 8% | 65 | 15 | 150 | |
| Surface or low | 89% | 6 | 3 | 10 | |
| Oak (eastern dry-xeric) | Replacement | 6% | 128 | 50 | 100 |
| Mixed | 16% | 50 | 20 | 30 | |
| Surface or low | 78% | 10 | 1 | 10 | |
*Fire Severities: Replacement=Any fire that causes greater than 75% top removal of a vegetation-fuel type, resulting in general replacement of existing vegetation; may or may not cause a lethal effect on the plants. Surface or low=Any fire that causes less than 25% upper layer replacement and/or removal in a vegetation-fuel class but burns 5% or more of the area. Mixed=Any fire burning more than 5% of an area that does not qualify as a replacement, surface, or low-severity fire; includes mosaic and other fires that are intermediate in effects [2,3]. | |||||
Plant Phenology
Phenology of the vegetation was not described prior to the April 1995 prescribed fire; some vegetation may have initiated growth by this time. Without the precise date of the fire and climate conditions in the months prior, it is difficult to describe the phenology of the vegetation as a whole.
The Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, burned this southern slope to promote oak and pitch pine regeneration in the long unburned and "degraded" community. Increased severity was predicted as the fire burned upslope. Researchers hoped that burned sites would have increased forage production, decreased mountain-laurel abundance, and increased pitch pine and oak (Quercus spp.) recruitment.
Strip head fires were used to burn the approximately 300-ha study area. On the ridge, the fire was stand replacing, and the understory was consumed [1,5]. At the low-slope position, the fire was patchy and burned only the understory. Aboveground flame temperatures and heat penetration were measured using heat-sensitive painted tiles. Flame temperatures were measured 1 and 2 m above ground. Belowground heat penetration was measured at the forest floor and in the mineral soil. Temperatures produced and heat penetration depths are summarized below [5].
| Slope position | Flame temperature (°C) | Average (range) of soil heat penetration (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 m | 2 m | 45 °C | 59 °C | |
| Low slope | <52 | <52 | 0.5 (0-3) | 0.6 (0-4) |
| Mid-slope | <52 to 160 | <52 to 90 | 18.2 (1-52) | 16.8 (4-52) |
| Ridge | <52 to >800 | <52 to >800 | 27.5 (9-55) | 24.0 (7-55) |
Fire Season/Severity Classification
Spring/low to high
Overstory dominance on the ridge was unchanged by the fire. Pitch pine, chestnut oak, and scarlet oak dominated the canopy vegetation both before and after the fire. Density- and basal area-based species richness were significantly (P≤0.05) reduced by the fire. Decreased richness was a result of American chestnut, blackgum, black locust, sassafras, and eastern hemlock mortality. Nearly all canopy species had decreased frequency, density, and basal area after the fire.
| Time since fire | Frequency (%) | Density (stems/ha) | Basal area (m²/ha) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | |
| American chestnut | 21 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0.11 | 0 |
| blackgum | 14 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 |
| black locust | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 |
| Carolina silverbell | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| chestnut oak | 93 | 64 | 239 | 146 | 5.22 | 3.33 |
| common serviceberry | 43 | 21 | 109 | 70 | 0.97 | 0.67 |
| eastern hemlock | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0.26 | 0 |
| hickory | 36 | 21 | 128 | 50 | 1.38 | 0.80 |
| northern red oak | 21 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| pitch pine | 93 | 78 | 637 | 441 | 12.45 | 9.67 |
| red maple | 50 | 21 | 108 | 41 | 2.14 | 1.21 |
| sassafras | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 |
| scarlet oak | 57 | 36 | 121 | 60 | 2.26 | 1.55 |
| sourwood | 50 | 50 | 96 | 77 | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| white oak | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Total | — | 1,545a* | 913b | 26.84a | 18.86b | — |
The average percent mortality following the fire ranged from 18.5% to 30.6% for the dominant overstory species (pitch pine, chestnut oak, and scarlet oak). For associated overstory species, mortality ranged from 25.0% to 100%.
| Species | N | Mortality (%) | SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| American chestnut | 3 | 100 | 0 |
| chestnut oak | 12 | 30.6 | 13.3 |
| common serviceberry | 4 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| hickory | 5 | 57.5 | 17.5 |
| pitch pine | 12 | 18.5 | 8.6 |
| red maple | 7 | 42.8 | 20.2 |
| scarlet oak | 8 | 29.2 | 16.0 |
Total density and basal area of understory vegetation on the ridge was significantly (P≤0.05) lower following the fire. However, total density and basal area increased with increased time since fire, although basal area and density had not recovered to prefire levels within a year of the fire. Mountain-laurel density and basal area were significantly (P≤0.05) lower after burning. Pitch pine understory density increased after the first postfire year. Black locust, chestnut oak, and scarlet oak densities were significantly (P≤0.05) greater after the ridge burned. White oak, northern red oak, and black oak were not present in the understory after the fire.
| Time since fire | Frequency (%) | Density (stems/ha) | Basal area (m²/ha) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prefire | 3 mo | 1 yr, 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | 1 yr, 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | 1 yr, 3 mo | |
| Understory species (≥1 cm basal diameter, <5 cm DBH) | |||||||||
| American chestnut | 21 | 0 | 21 | 952 | 0 | 413 | 0.536 | 0 | 0.184 |
| black locust | 14 | 0 | 28 | 10b* | 0 | 813a | 0.002 | 0 | 0.119 |
| black oak | 36 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0.010 | 0 | 0 |
| chestnut oak | 50 | 14 | 21 | 505b | 25c | 720a | 0.244 | 0.024 | 0.097 |
| deerberry | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 317 | 0 | 0 | 0.025 |
| common serviceberry | 36 | 7 | 7 | 76a | 6b | 3b | 0.027 | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| flame azalea | 7 | 0 | 7 | 159a | 0 | 19b | 0.038 | 0 | 0.002 |
| hickory | 14 | 0 | 14 | 82 | 0 | 161 | 0.022 | 0 | 0.025 |
| mountain-laurel | 100 | 21 | 14 | 8,651a | 248b | 168b | 4.97a | 0.127b | 0.403b |
| northern red oak | 36 | 0 | 0 | 368a | 19b | 0 | 0.187 | 0.002 | 0 |
| pitch pine | 21 | 0 | 7 | 165 | 0 | 317 | 0.212 | 0 | 0.035 |
| red maple | 43 | 14 | 14 | 168 | 13 | 82 | 0.045 | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| sassafras | 36 | 7 | 36 | 321b | 82c | 571a | 0.050 | 0.191 | 0.102 |
| scarlet oak | 50 | 7 | 50 | 295b | 6c | 1,997a | 0.078b | 0.008b | 0.222a |
| sourwood | 7 | 0 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 29 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| sweet birch | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 |
| white oak | 28 | 0 | 0 | 397 | 0 | 0 | 0.096 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | — | — | 12,178a | 409c | 5,692b | 6.522a | 0.371c | 1.236b | — |
The number of pitch pine seedlings increased by 358% in the third postfire month but was 35% of the prefire number a year following the fire. Common serviceberry seedlings increased by 350% a year after the fire.
The coverage of ground layer vegetation on the ridge slightly exceeded prefire levels by the first postfire year. Black oak, white oak, sourwood, and black locust were present in the prefire surface layer but were not present a year after the fire. Red maple, chestnut oak, and sassafras had greater cover after than before the fire. Blueberry, buffalo nut, mountain sweetpepperbush, and flame azalea all had greater than prefire cover levels 1 year after the fire. Pitch pine, present with low cover in prefire vegetation, was absent from the ground layer after the fire. Most herbs and vines present in the prefire community had increased cover in the first postfire year. Sedge and goldenrod species present in the prefire community, however, were absent from the community a year after fire. Bedstraw, western brackenfern, greater tickseed, common goldstar, bellwort, Michaux's saxifrage, New York fern, plains snakecotton, little bluestem, and panicgrass were only found on the ridge after the fire.
| Time since fire | Prefire | 3 mo | 1 year, 3 mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground layer species | Cover (%) | ||
| Trees | |||
| American chestnut | 0 | 0.7 | 0 |
| black locust | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0 |
| black oak | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0 |
| chestnut oak | 0.25 | 0.10 | 1.29 |
| common serviceberry | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| northern red oak | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.25 |
| pitch pine | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0 |
| red maple | 0.25 | 0.08 | 1.17 |
| sassafras | 0.10 | 0.25 | 2.88 |
| scarlet oak | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.21 |
| sourwood | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0 |
| white oak | 0.03 | 0 | 0 |
| Shrubs | |||
| blackberry | 0 | 0 | 0.12 |
| black huckleberry | 1.03 | 1.88 | 0.96 |
| blueberry | 2.28 | 2.28 | 5.17 |
| buffalo nut | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.67 |
| flame azalea | 0.02 | 0.25 | 1.46 |
| mountain-laurel (clone density = #/ha) | 28.0 | 3.67 (11,307) | 11.4 (9,285) |
| mountain sweetpepperbush | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.96 |
| smooth sumac | 0 | 0.03 | 0 |
| Forbs | |||
| bedstraw | 0 | 0.13 | 1.33 |
| bellwort | 0 | 0.03 | 0 |
| common goldstar | 0 | 0.05 | 0 |
| beetleweed | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.92 |
| greater tickseed | 0 | 0.05 | 0 |
| goldenrod | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
| Indian cucumber | 0.02 | 0 | 0.12 |
| Michaux's saxifrage | 0 | 0.02 | 0.29 |
| narrowleaf cowwheat | 0.22 | 0.02 | 1.17 |
| New York fern | 0 | 0.02 | 0 |
| plains snakecotton | 0 | 0 | 0.12 |
| trailing arbutus | 0.55 | 0.10 | 0.33 |
| western brackenfern | 0 | 0.10 | 0.42 |
| Graminoids | |||
| little bluestem | 0 | 0.23 | 0.54 |
| panicgrass | 0 | 0 | 2.75 |
| sedge | 1.08 | 0.10 | 0 |
| Vines | |||
| greenbrier | 0.63 | 0.40 | 2.71 |
| Total | 10.6 | 37.7 | — |
| Species richness | 24 | 33 | 26 |
| Pielou evenness index | 0.32 | 0.61 | 0.77 |
The fire at the midslope position was less severe than that at the ridge. Total pre- and postfire overstory density and basal area were not significantly (P≤0.05) different, and pre- and postfire differences in individual overstory species frequency, density, and basal area were little to none.
| Time since fire | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Frequency (%) | Density (stems/ha) | Basal area (m²/ha) | |||
| blackgum | 22 | 22 | 156 | 156 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| black locust | 56 | 44 | 89 | 64 | 0.66 | 0.53 |
| Carolina silverbell | 11 | 11 | 44 | 33 | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| chestnut oak | 56 | 44 | 99 | 94 | 6.47 | 6.44 |
| cucumber-tree | 11 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| common serviceberry | 33 | 33 | 38 | 38 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| eastern hemlock | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| hickory | 67 | 67 | 173 | 178 | 2.84 | 2.89 |
| red maple | 200 | 100 | 626 | 606 | 9.01 | 9.02 |
| scarlet oak | 22 | 22 | 38 | 27 | 4.00 | 3.91 |
| sourwood | 67 | 67 | 153 | 137 | 3.16 | 3.11 |
| sweet birch | 22 | 22 | 5 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Total | — | — | 1,448a* | 1,365a | 28.69a | 28.42a |
Total density and basal area of midslope vegetation was significantly (P≤0.05) reduced by the fire. Red maple, American chestnut, mountain-laurel, and sourwood had significantly (P≤0.05) lower density and basal area after the fire. Hickory, Carolina silverbell, cucumber-tree, buffalo nut, white oak, black locust, and eastern hemlock were present in the prefire community but were not present 3 months after the fire. Rosebay, a dominant in the prefire understory, remained dominant after the fire with relatively little change in density or basal area after the fire.
| Time since fire | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understory species (≥1 cm basal diameter, <0.5 cm DBH) | Frequency (%) | Density (stems/ha) | Basal area (m²/ha) | |||
| American chestnut | 44 | 11 | 573a* | 20b | 0.127a | 0.002b |
| blackgum | 11 | 11 | 123a | 10b | 0.012a | 0.012a |
| black locust | 11 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0.008 | 0 |
| buffalo nut | 11 | 0 | 123 | 0 | 0.047 | 0 |
| Carolina silverbell | 22 | 0 | 494 | 0 | 0.064 | 0 |
| chestnut oak | 11 | 11 | 25 | 5 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
| cucumber-tree | 11 | 0 | 123 | 0 | 0.019 | 0 |
| eastern hemlock | 11 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0.002 | 0 |
| hickory | 11 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.006 | 0 |
| mountain-laurel | 67 | 11 | 4,691a | 123b | 4.497a | 0.422b |
| northern red oak | 22 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0.010 | 0 |
| red maple | 56 | 22 | 326a | 15b | 0.494a | 0.019a |
| rosebay | 22 | 11 | 1,605a | 1,358a | 7.231a | 7.789a |
| sourwood | 22 | 11 | 138a | 25b | 0.015a | 0.002b |
| white oak | 22 | 0 | 247 | 0 | 0.020 | 0 |
| Total | — | 8,518a | 1,556b | 12.56a | 8.25b | — |
The fire at the low-slope position was less severe than that at the ridge or midslope. Total pre- and postfire canopy density and basal area were not significantly (P≤0.05) different, and pre- and postfire differences in individual species frequency, density, and basal area were little to none.
| Time since fire | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Frequency (%) | Density (stems/ha) | Basal area (m²/ha) | |||
| American chestnut | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| American witchhazel | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| blackgum | 11 | 11 | 22 | 22 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| black locust | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Carolina silverbell | 22 | 11 | 44 | 15 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| chestnut oak | 33 | 33 | 32 | 32 | 0.63 | 0.62 |
| cucumber-tree | 11 | 11 | 30 | 39 | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| common serviceberry | 44 | 33 | 47 | 37 | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| eastern hemlock | 89 | 89 | 238 | 243 | 3.80 | 3.87 |
| hickory | 78 | 78 | 186 | 167 | 6.64 | 6.62 |
| northern red oak | 33 | 33 | 21 | 21 | 0.61 | 0.63 |
| red maple | 89 | 89 | 333 | 328 | 6.54 | 6.59 |
| sassafras | 11 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| scarlet oak | 33 | 33 | 21 | 21 | 3.12 | 3.16 |
| sugar maple | 11 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| sourwood | 11 | 11 | 22 | 22 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| striped maple | 44 | 44 | 64 | 64 | 0.49 | 0.50 |
| white oak | 22 | 22 | 36 | 36 | 2.88 | 2.90 |
| tuliptree | 22 | 22 | 15 | 15 | 0.48 | 0.51 |
| Total | — | 1,167a* | 1,117a | 27.72a | 27.82a | — |
The low-severity fire at the low slope increased total understory stem density, though not significantly. Hawthorn, which was not present before the fire, had a density of 123 stems/ha 3 months after the fire. Postfire densities of American chestnut, white ash, Carolina silverbell, and buffalo nut were more than double the prefire densities 3 months after spring burning. Densities of flame azalea, eastern hemlock, northern red oak, and hickory decreased by more than half, and mountain magnolia and chestnut oak were absent after the fire.
| Time since fire | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo | Prefire | 3 mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understory species (≥1 cm basal diameter, <0.5 cm DBH) | Frequency (%) | Density (stems/ha) | Basal area (m²/ha) | |||
| American chestnut | 33 | 44 | 138 | 592 | 0.044 | 0.115 |
| buffalo nut | 11 | 33 | 123 | 370 | 0.051 | 0.135 |
| Carolina silverbell | 33 | 33 | 59 | 138 | 0.022 | 0.031 |
| chestnut oak | 11 | 0 | 5 | 0 | <0.001 | 0 |
| cucumber-tree | 33 | 44 | 207 | 301 | 0.056 | 0.074 |
| common serviceberry | 33 | 22 | 30 | 54 | 0.016 | 0.037 |
| eastern hemlock | 22 | 22 | 143 | 20 | 0.4 | 0.019 |
| flame azalea | 11 | 11 | 864 | 370 | 0.32 | 0.200 |
| hawthorn | 0 | 11 | 0 | 123 | 0 | 0.014 |
| hickory | 11 | 11 | 40 | 10 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| mountain magnolia | 11 | 0 | 5 | 0 | <0.001 | 0 |
| northern red oak | 22 | 22 | 133 | 64 | 0.026 | 0.005 |
| red maple | 22 | 22 | 30 | 44 | 0.010 | 0.021 |
| sugar maple | 33 | 33 | 138 | 158 | 0.026 | 0.032 |
| striped maple | 22 | 22 | 133 | 153 | 0.018 | 0.026 |
| sourwood | 11 | 11 | 5 | 10 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| sweet birch | 11 | 11 | 5 | 10 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| white ash | 11 | 22 | 15 | 79 | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| white oak | 22 | 11 | 10 | 34 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| tuliptree | 22 | 33 | 69 | 118 | 0.011 | 0.020 |
| Total | — | 2,153a* | 2,652a | 1.015a | 0.758a | — |
This southern slope was burned to encourage oak and pitch pine regeneration in the long unburned and "degraded" community. Researchers hoped that burned sites would have increased forage production and decreased mountain-laurel abundance. On the ridge, the abundance of red maple was reduced by the fire, and growth and recruitment of several oak species increased in the understory. The fire decreased mountain-laurel density and basal area on the ridge and midslope positions. However, without later postfire sampling it is unclear whether or not pitch pine and oak regeneration will be successful before mountain-laurel density and basal area recover to prefire levels. The early mortality of postfire pitch pine seedlings suggests that successful pitch pine regeneration may require another prescribed fire or canopy-opening disturbance. Low postfire precipitation, high postfire basal area, and/or the lack of litter and duff consumption may have increased postfire pitch pine seedling mortality. In the understory, blueberries, black huckleberry, little bluestem, and panicgrasses increased in number, increasing wildlife forage in the area.
While the spring fire in the southern Appalachians increased wildlife forage and encouraged oak regeneration, it did not allow for successful regeneration of pitch pine. A high-severity fire, burning when pitch pine cone crops are good, may produce an environment conducive to successful pitch pine recruitment. Researchers suggest an initial high-severity fire and subsequent low-severity fires at 5- to 10-year intervals may encourage pitch pine and oak dominance and limit mountain-laurel density.
Table A1: Common and scientific names of species mentioned in this summary.
| Common name | Scientific name |
|---|---|
| striped maple | Acer pensylvanicum |
| red maple | Acer rubrum |
| sugar maple | Acer saccharum |
| common serviceberry | Amelanchier arborea |
| sweet birch | Betula lenta |
| sedge | Carex spp. |
| hickory | Carya spp. |
| American chestnut | Castanea dentata |
| mountain sweetpepperbush | Clethra acuminata |
| greater tickseed | Coreopsis major |
| hawthorn | Crataegus spp. |
| trailing arbutus | Epigaea repens |
| white ash | Fraxinus americana |
| plains snakecotton | Froelichia floridana |
| beetleweed | Galax urceolata |
| bedstraw | Galium spp. |
| black huckleberry | Gaylussacia baccata |
| Carolina silverbell | Halesia carolina |
| American witchhazel | Hamamelis virginiana |
| common goldstar | Hypoxis hirsuta |
| mountain-laurel | Kalmia latifolia |
| tuliptree | Liriodendron tulipifera |
| cucumber-tree | Magnolia acuminata |
| mountain magnolia | Magnolia fraseri |
| Indian cucumber | Medeola virginiana |
| narrowleaf cowwheat | Melampyrum lineare |
| blackgum | Nyssa sylvatica |
| sourwood | Oxydendrum arboreum |
| panicgrass | Panicum spp. |
| pitch pine | Pinus rigida |
| western brackenfern | Pteridium aquilinum |
| buffalo nut | Pyrularia pubera |
| white oak | Quercus alba |
| scarlet oak | Quercus coccinea |
| chestnut oak | Quercus prinus |
| northern red oak | Quercus rubra |
| black oak | Quercus velutina |
| smooth sumac | Rhus glabra |
| flame azalea | Rhododendron calendulaceum |
| rosebay | Rhododendron maximum |
| black locust | Robinia pseudoacacia |
| blackberry | Rubus spp. |
| sassafras | Sassafras albidum |
| Michaux's saxifrage | Saxifraga michauxii |
| little bluestem | Schizachyrium scoparium |
| greenbrier | Smilax spp. |
| goldenrod | Solidago spp. |
| New York fern | Thelypteris noveboracensis |
| eastern hemlock | Tsuga canadensis |
| bellwort | Uvularia spp. |
| deerberry | Vaccinium stamineum |
| blueberry | Vaccinium spp. |
1. Elliott, Katherine J.; Hendrick, Ronald L.; Major, Amy E.; Vose, James M.; Swank, Wayne T. 1999. Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management. 114(2-3): 199-213. [30079]
2. Hann, Wendel; Havlina, Doug; Shlisky, Ayn; [and others]. 2005. Interagency fire regime condition class guidebook. Version 1.2, [Online]. In: Interagency fire regime condition class website. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior; The Nature Conservancy; Systems for Environmental Management (Producer). Variously paginated [+ appendices]. Available: http://www.frcc.gov/docs/1.2.2.2/Complete_Guidebook_V1.2.pdf [2007, May 23]. [66734]
3. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2005. Reference condition modeling manual (Version 2.1), [Online]. In: LANDFIRE. Cooperative Agreement 04-CA-11132543-189. Boulder, CO: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior (Producers). 72 p. Available: http://www.landfire.gov/downloadfile.php?file=RA_Modeling_Manual_v2_1.pdf [2007, May 24]. [66741]
4. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2007. Rapid assessment reference condition models. In: LANDFIRE. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab; U.S. Geological Survey; The Nature Conservancy (Producers). Available: http://www.landfire.gov/models_EW.php [66533]
5. Vose, James M.; Swank, Wayne T.; Clinton, Barton D.; Knoepp, Jennifer D.; Swift, Lloyd W. 1999. Using stand replacement fires to restore southern Appalachian pine-hardwood ecosystems: effects on mass, carbon, and nutrient pools. Forest Ecology and Management. 114(2-3): 215-226. [30149]