T
T
T
Species Review

Juglans nigra, black walnut

Written
December, 1991
Contributors
Milo Coladonato - 1st Author

Coladonato, Milo. 1991. Juglans nigra, black walnut. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/species-reviews/jugnig

DOI
10.2737/feis-species-review-jugnig

AbbreviationCommon NameScientific NameClassificationStatus
Plants
JUGNIGblack walnutJuglans nigraLife Form: Plants/Tree
Kingdom: Plantae
Class: Dicot
Order: Juglandales
Family: Juglandaceae
Genus: Juglans
Fed. Protected: No
Nativity: Native
Invasiveness: Noninvasive

Taxonomy

The currently accepted scientific name for black walnut is Juglans nigra L. [21]. There are no recognized subspecies, varieties, or forms. Black walnut and butternut (J. cinerea) often grow together but apparently never cross naturally [43].

Synonyms

  • None

Other Common Names

walnut, eastern black walnut, American walnut

General Distribution

Black walnut is found throughout the eastern United States. It grows as far north as southern Minnesota, southern Wisconsin, southern Michigan, and southern Ontario. Isolated populations occur in the southern half of New York, Vermont, western Massachusetts, and northwestern Connecticut. Its range extends south to northwestern Florida, and to Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana except for the Mississippi Valley and Delta regions. In the Midwest, isolated populations occur in eastern Texas, western Oklahoma, central Kansas, and southeastern South Dakota [8,29,30]. Black walnut is cultivated in Hawaii [45].

States and Provinces

  • United States: AL AR CT DE FL GA HI IA IL IN KS KY LA MA MD MI MN MO MS NC NE NJ NY OH OK PA SC SD TN TX VA VT WI WV
  • Canada: ON

Site Characteristics

Black walnut is found on a variety of sites but grows best on deep, well-drained neutral soils that are moist and fertile [43]. It grows slowly on wet bottomlands, dry ridges, and slopes. Black walnut is common on limestone soils [9,10] and grows extremely well on deep loams and fertile alluvial deposits. Good agricultural soils are generally favorable sites for black walnut. In the Appalachians, the best walnut trees are found on bottomlands and coves below 4,000 feet (1,200 m) [5].

Principal associates are identified in Table A1. Other common tree associates include American elm (Ulmus americana), hackberry (Celtis laevigata), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), box elder (Acer negundo), and butternut (Juglans cinerea) [29].

Plant Communities

No entry.

Botanical Description

Black walnut is a native, deciduous tree that can grow to a height of 125 feet (38 m) but ordinarily grows to around 80 feet (25 m) [10,43]. Black walnut develops a long, smooth trunk and a small, rounded crown when growing in the forest. In the open, the trunk forks low with a few ascending and spreading coarse branches. The root system usually consists of a deep taproot and several wide-spreading lateral roots. The bark on young trees is dark and scaly but becomes darker with rounded intersecting ridges on mature trees [17,39].

Raunkiaer Life Form (Raunkiaer 1934)

  • Phanerophyte

Seasonal Development

Black walnut normally begins flowering about mid-April in the southern part of its geographic range and mid-June in the northern part of its range. The fruit ripens in September or October of the same year, dropping shortly after the leaves fall [10,29].

Regeneration Processes

A photo looking up into a tree with light green, pointed leaves. At the center is a cluster of 3 round, green fruits.
Photo Credit
Photo by Rebekah D. Wallace, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org.

Black walnut with fruits.

Seed production

Black walnut produces abundant seed crops irregularly, perhaps twice in 5 years. Although open-grown trees produce seed as early as 8 years after planting, the minimum seed-bearing age for commercial quantities of seed is about 12 years. Best seed production begins when the tree is about 30 years old and continues for another 100 years [31,43].

Dispersal

Black walnut seed is heavy. The seeds are dispersed by squirrels carrying seed from beneath the tree and burying them at a distance [29,36].

Seedling development

Many black walnut seedlings germinate from the nuts cached by squirrels in the fall. Normal freezing and thawing usually causes the seeds to break dormancy the following spring, but germination is often delayed, sometimes until the second year [3,35].

Vegetative reproduction

Small black walnut trees usually sprout from the stump when they are cut or killed back by fire. Shoots originating high on the older stumps often decay, but shoots from the root crown generally are free from defect [22,43].

Successional Status

Black walnut is classified as shade intolerant. In mixed forest stands, it must be dominant to survive, although it can survive in the relatively light shade of black locust [43]. Black walnut is found in many of the climax associations but because of its intolerance is not classified as a climax tree in the strict sense. In general, black walnut maintains itself in most stands as scattered single trees occupying openings in the canopy [15].

Immediate Fire Effects

Young black walnut trees are typically top-killed by most fires [18,31].

Postfire Regeneration Strategy (Stickney 1989)

  • survivor species; on-site surviving root crown or caudex
  • off-site colonizer; seed carried by animals or water; postfire yr 1&2

Fire Adaptations

Black walnut is well adapted to fire. Mature trees have thick bark and naturally durable heartwood which make them relatively resistant to damage and decay following fire [32,34,43].

Plant Response to Fire

Small 20- to 30-year-old black walnut trees will usually sprout from the root collar or stump when top-killed by fire. Sprouting is more erratic from trees 30 years and older [31,43].

Fire Regimes

For fire regime information, search FEIS for this species by entering the species name or acronym on the home page and selecting “Fire Regime” as the publication type.

Fire Management Considerations

Where the danger of fire exists, fuel buildup in young black walnut plantations should be reduced by removing grasses and weeds [1,31,42].

Federal Status

None

Other Status

No entry.

Importance to Wildlife and Livestock

The nuts of black walnut furnish food for many rodents and make up about 10 percent of the diet of eastern fox squirrels [19,33]. The nuts are also eaten by a variety of birds [2].

Palatability and Nutritional Value

Although not considered a choice browse, black walnut leaves are palatable to white-tailed deer [16].

Nutrient percentages (dry basis) for the nuts of black walnut are as follows [41]:

Crude protein29.25
Ether60.25
Crude fiber1.03
Ash2.76
N-free extract6.73
Available protein27.06
Lignin0.87
Cellulose2.01
Tannin0.25
Calcium0.01
Magnesium0.27
Phosphorus0.59

Cover Value

The eastern screech-owl roosts on the limbs of black walnut [6].

Value for Rehabilitation or Restoration of Disturbed Sites

Black walnut has been successfully planted on surface mined areas in the eastern United States [4,7]. In southwestern Indiana, black walnut had a 30 to 50 percent increase in survival rate on old mine field sites where weed competition had been chemically controlled or removed [4].

Other Uses

The nuts of black walnut are used as food by humans and are harvested commercially [26]. The nuts are eaten plain or with honey and used to flavor cakes, candy, and ice cream [14]. Native Americans used the nuts for food and extracted black dye from the roots. The black walnut is mentioned in Native American creation myths [14]. Black walnut is cultivated as an ornamental [40].

The ground shells of black walnut are used as a nonslip agent in automobile tires, as an air pressure propellant in strip paints, and as a filtering agent for scrubbers in smoke stacks. The automobile industry uses the ground shell products to deburr precision gears, and the airline industry uses the ground shells to clean jet engines [43].

Wood Products Value: Black walnut wood is heavy, strong, and highly resistant to shock. It ranks with the most durable U.S. hardwoods, including cedars (Thuja spp.), chestnuts (Castanea spp.), and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). It can be satisfactorily kiln dried and holds it shape well after seasoning. Black walnut is normally straight grained, is worked easily with hand tools, and has excellent machining properties. When finished, the wood takes on a smooth velvety surface and a handsome grain pattern [25,29].

Black walnut is used principally for dining room and bedroom furniture; bookcases; desks; tables; radio, television, phonograph, and piano cabinets; and as an interior finish in cafes and public buildings [24]. The veneer is used for the highest grade cabinets and plywood panels. Figured black walnut stocks are prized for expensive shotguns and sporting rifles [8,29].

Other Management Considerations

Weed control is essential for the establishment of black walnut on sites suitable for intensive culture [31].

An antagonism between black walnut and many other plants growing within its root zone has been recognized and attributed to juglone, a toxic substance found in the leaves, bark, nut husks, and roots of black walnut trees. Many garden vegetables and several conifers are susceptible to juglone [12,17,28].

Black walnut is particularly susceptible to European canker (Nectria galligena). The infection spreads quite slowly, but infected trees eventually die [29,43].

Black alder (Alnus glutinosa) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) interplanted with black walnut increases black walnut's yield because of their ability to increase available nitrogen in the soil [37,44].

Table A1— Forest and range ecosystems, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) physiographic regions, Kuchler plant associations, Society for American Foresters (SAF) forest cover types, and Society for Rangeland Management (SRM) rangeland cover types in which this species occurs.

Forest and Range Ecosystems (Garrison et al. 1977)

  • FRES10 White - red - jack pine
  • FRES11 Spruce - fir
  • FRES12 Longleaf - slash pine
  • FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine
  • FRES14 Oak - pine
  • FRES15 Oak - hickory
  • FRES16 Oak - gum - cypress
  • FRES17 Elm - ash - cottonwood
  • FRES18 Maple - beech - birch

BLM Physiographic Regions (Bernard and Brown 1977)

  • No entry.

Kuchler Plant Associations (Kuchler 1964)

  • K089 Black Belt
  • K095 Great Lakes pine forest
  • K096 Northeastern spruce - fir forest
  • K097 Southeastern spruce - fir forest
  • K099 Maple - basswood
  • K100 Oak - hickory forest
  • K101 Elm - ash forest
  • K102 Beech - maple forest
  • K103 Mixed mesophytic forest
  • K104 Appalachian oak forest
  • K106 Northern hardwoods
  • K107 Northern hardwoods - fir forest
  • K108 Northern hardwoods - spruce forest
  • K110 Northeastern oak - pine forest
  • K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest
  • K112 Southern mixed forest
  • K113 Southern floodplain forest
  • K114 Pocosin

SAF Cover Types (Eyre 1980)

  • 14 Northern pin oak
  • 18 Paper birch
  • 19 Gray birch - red maple
  • 21 Eastern white pine
  • 22 White pine - hemlock
  • 23 Eastern hemlock
  • 26 Sugar maple - basswood
  • 27 Sugar maple
  • 28 Black cherry - maple
  • 40 Post oak - blackjack oak
  • 42 Bur oak
  • 43 Bear oak
  • 44 Chestnut oak
  • 45 Pitch pine
  • 46 Eastern redcedar
  • 52 White oak - black oak - northern red oak
  • 53 White oak
  • 55 Northern red oak
  • 57 Yellow-poplar
  • 58 Yellow-poplar - eastern hemlock
  • 59 Yellow-poplar - white oak - northern red oak
  • 60 Beech sugar maple
  • 61 River birch - sycamore
  • 62 Silver maple - American elm
  • 64 Sassafras - persimmon
  • 65 Pin oak - sweet gum
  • 75 Shortleaf pine
  • 76 Shortleaf pine - oak
  • 78 Virginia pine - oak
  • 79 Virginia pine
  • 80 Loblolly pine - shortleaf pine
  • 81 Loblolly pine
  • 82 Loblolly pine - hardwood
  • 91 Swamp chestnut oak - cherrybark oak
  • 93 Sugarberry - American elm - green ash

SRM Rangeland Cover Types (Shiflet 1994)

  • No entry.

1. Abrams, Marc D. 1988. Effects of prescribed fire on woody vegetation in a gallery forest understory in northeastern Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 91(3-4): 63-70. [10796]

2. Adams, Diana L.; Barrett, Gary W. 1976. Stress effects on bird-species diversity within mature forest ecosystems. American Midland Naturalist. 96(1): 179-194. [16495]

3. Albertson, F. W.; Weaver, J. E. 1945. Injury and death or recovery of trees in prairie climate. Ecological Monographs. 15: 393-433. [4328]

4. Andersen, C. P.; Bussler, B. H.; Chaney, W. R.; [and others]. 1989. Concurrent establishment of ground cover and hardwood trees on reclaimed mined land and unmined reference sites. Forest Ecology and Management. 28: 81-99. [10920]

5. Beck, Donald E. 1988. Regenerating cove hardwood stands. In: Smith, H. Clay; Perkey, Arlyn W.; Kidd, William E., Jr., eds. Guidelines for regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands: Workshop proceedings; 1988 May 24-26; Morgantown, WV. SAF Publ. 88-03. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Books: 156-166. [13943]

6. Belthoff, James R.; Ritchison, Gary. 1990. Roosting behavior of postfledging eastern screech-owls. Auk. 107(3): 567-579. [13296]

7. Blewett, Thomas J. 1988. Natural forest recovery of lead pit mines. Restoration & Management Notes. 6(2): 92-93. [6140]

8. Brinkman, Kenneth A. 1974. Juglans L. walnut. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., ed. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 454-459. [7684]

9. Clark, F. Bryan. 1970. Measures necessary for natural regeneration of oaks, yellow-poplar, sweetgum, and black walnut. In: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, eds. The silviculture of oaks & associated species; a summary of current information presented at the SAF annual meeting, Oct. 1968. Res. Pap. NE-144. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 17-25. [12005]

10. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1988. Trees of the southeastern United States. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 322 p. [12764]

11. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]

12. Ferguson, Dennis E.; Boyd, Raymond J. 1988. Bracken fern inhibition of conifer regeneration in northern Idaho. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 11 p. [2834]

13. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]

14. Gilmore, Melvin Randolph. 1919. Uses of plants by the Indians of the Missouri River region. 33rd Annual Report. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology. 154 p. [6928]

15. Hammitt, William E.; Barnes, Burton V. 1989. Composition and structure of an old-growth oak-hickory forest in southern Michigan over 20 years. In: Rink, George; Budelsky, Carl A., eds. Proceedings, 7th central hardwood conference; 1989 March 5-8; Carbondale, IL. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-132. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 247-253. [9386]

16. Harlow, Richard F.; Shrauder, Paul A.; Seehorn, Monte E. 1975. Deer browse resources of the Oconee National Forest. Res. Pap. SE-137. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 16 p. [14602]

17. Hosie, R. C. 1969. Native trees of Canada. 7th ed. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Forestry Service, Department of Fisheries and Forestry. 380 p. [3375]

18. Huntley, Jimmy C.; McGee, Charles E. 1981. Timber and wildlife implications of fire in young upland hardwoods. In: Barnett, James P., ed. Proceedings, 1st biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 1980 November 6-7; Atlanta, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-34. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 56-66. [12080]

19. Kraus, Kent E.; Smith, Christopher C. 1987. Fox squirrel use of prairie habitats in relation to winter food supply and vegetation density. Prairie Naturalist. 19(2): 115-120. [150]

20. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]

21. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]

22. Loomis, Robert M. 1977. Wildfire effects on an oak-hickory forest in southeast Missouri. Res. Note NC-219. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 4 p. [8738]

23. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]

24. Marquis, David A.; Johnson, Robert L. 1989. Silviculture of eastern hardwoods. In: Burns, Russell M., compiler. The scientific basis for silvicultural and management decisions in the National Forest System. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-55. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 9-15. [10242]

25. Ontario Department of Lands and Forests. 1953. Forest tree planting. 2d ed. Bull. No. R 1. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Division of Reforestation. 68 p. [12130]

26. Randall, Charles Edgar. 1968. Enjoying our trees. Washington, DC: The American Forestry Association. 122 p. [1933]

27. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

28. Rice, Elroy L. 1974. Allelopathy. New York: Academic Press, Inc. 353 p. [3317]

29. Rink, George. 1988. Black Walnut an American wood. FS-270. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 7 p. [12083]

30. Rogers, Robert. 1990. Quercus alba L. white oak. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 605-613. [13973]

31. Schlesinger, Richard C.; Funk, David T. 1977. Manager's handbook for black walnut. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-38. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 22 p. [11641]

32. Simpfendorfer, K. J. 1989. Trees, farms and fires. Land and Forests Bulletin No. 30. Victoria, Australia: Department of Conservation, Forests and Lands, Lands and Forests Division. 55 p. [10649]

33. Smith, Christopher C.; Follmer, David. 1972. Food preferences of squirrels. Ecology. 53: 82-91. [2942]

34. Spalt, Karl W.; Reifsnyder, William E. 1962. Bark characteristics and fire resistance: a literature survey. Occas. Paper 193. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 19 p. In cooperation with: Yale University, School of Forestry. [266]

35. Stapanian, Martin A.; Smith, Christopher C. 1984. Density-dependent survival of scatterhoarded nuts: an experimental approach. Ecology. 65(5): 1387-1396. [10380]

36. Stapanian, Martin A.; Smith, Christopher C. 1986. How Fox Squirrels influence the invasion of prairies by nut-bearing trees. Journal of Mammalogy. 67(2): 326-332. [11978]

37. Torrey, John G. 1978. Nitrogen fixation by actinomycete-nodulated angiosperms. Bioscience. 28(9): 586-592. [8517]

38. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]

39. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States, their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240]

40. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. [7707]

41. Wainio, Walter W.; Forbes, E. B. 1941. The chemical composition of forest fruits and nuts from Pennsylvania. Journal of Agricultural Research. 62(10): 627-635. [5401]

42. Walker, Laurence C. 1990. Forests: A naturalist's guide to trees and forest ecology. Wiley Nature Editions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 288 p. [13341]

43. Williams, Robert D. 1990. Juglans nigra L. black walnut. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 391-399. [13967]

44. Zitzer, S. F.; Dawson, J. O. 1989. Seasonal changes in nodular nitrogenase activity of Alnus glutinosa and Elaeagnus angustifolia. Tree Physiology. 5: 185-194. [8698]

45. St. John, Harold. 1973. List and summary of the flowering plants in the Hawaiian islands. Hong Kong: Cathay Press Limited. 519 p. [25354]

Last updated June 9, 2025