T
T
T
Species Review

Juniperus coahuilensis, redberry juniper

Written
January, 1993
Contributors
Janet Sullivan - 1st Author

Sullivan, Janet. 1993. Juniperus coahuilensis, redberry juniper. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/species-reviews/juncoa

AbbreviationCommon NameScientific NameClassificationStatus
Plants
JUNCOAredberry juniperJuniperus coahuilensisLife Form: Plants/Shrub, Plants/Tree
Kingdom: Plantae
Class: Conifer
Order: Pinales
Family: Cupressaceae
Genus: Juniperus
Fed. Protected: No
Nativity: Native
Invasiveness: Noninvasive

Taxonomy

The currently accepted scientific name for redberry juniper is Juniperus coahuilensis (Martinez) Gaussen [10,26,27]. Confusion about the correct name for this entity arose over its morphological resemblance to oneseed juniper (J. monosperma) and over its red cones, which resemble those of Pinchot juniper (J. pinchottii). Redberry juniper intergrades with Pinchot juniper in the Trans-Pecos region of Texas, where their ranges overlap. There is a probable hybrid swarm in the Basin of the Chisos Mountains, Texas [1,14]. Zanoni and Adams [24] determined that redberry juniper and Pinchot juniper are the most closely related junipers based on similarity of leaf oil terpenoids and other characters.

Synonyms

  • Juniperus erythrocarpa var. coahuilensis Martinez [23]
  • Juniperus texensis Van Melle [25]

Other Common Names

rose-fruited juniper

General Distribution

Redberry juniper occurs in disjunct populations from western Texas (Trans-Pecos), southwestern New Mexico, and southern Arizona south to San Luis Potosi, Mexico [10,14].

States and Provinces

  • United States: AZ NM TX
  • Mexico

Site Characteristics

A photo of a round, shrubby conifer tree growing in a rocky desert setting, with some prickly pear cactus in the foreground.
Photo Credit
Photo by Jeff Bisbee, iNaturalist.org, some rights reserved.

Redberry juniper with opuntia spp., Jeff Davis County, Texas. (CC BY-NC 4.0)

In Trans-Pecos Texas junipers are most common on rocky or poor soils [14]. Redberry juniper occurs most often on dry, well-drained soils in full sun [19]. It occurs at elevations of 4,000 feet (1,200 m) to 6,500 feet (2,000 m) through its range [1,16].

Plant Communities

In the Southwest junipers (Juniperus spp.) are associated with oaks (Quercus spp.) and true pinyon (Pinus edulis). Junipers increase in dominance over oaks and pinyons on dry sites [14]. Redberry juniper is common in alligator juniper (J. deppeana)-pinyon woodlands and savannas, and in areas where its range overlaps with Utah juniper (J. osteosperma), oneseed juniper (J. monosperma), and Rocky Mountain juniper (J. scopulorum) [8]. It occurs in evergreen oak woodlands with Emory oak (Q. emoryi) and Mexican blue oak (Q. oblongifolia) [11]. Redberry juniper is also found in Arizona chaparral woodlands with shrub live oak (Q. turbinella) and Arizona rosewood (Vauquelinia californica) [20]. It occurs as scattered individuals in grama (Bouteloua spp.) grasslands, along with scattered velvet mesquite (Prosopis velutina), Mexican blue oak, and alligator juniper [14].

A publication listing redberry juniper as a codominant species is as follows:

  • Classification of pinyon-juniper (p-j) sites on National Forests in the Southwest [12]

Botanical Description

A photo of a conifer branch with tight, small needle-like leaves and reddish berries. The background is more branches and sky.
Photo Credit
Photo by Debbie T., iNaturalist.org, some rights reserved.

Redberry juniper with its berry-like cones, Jeff Davis County, Texas. (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Redberry juniper is a native, evergreen, small tree or large shrub. Mature height usually ranges from 12 to 15 feet (3.6-4.5 m), with spreading and ascending branches forming an open, irregular crown. The ovulate cones contain one seed [15]. The bark is shreddy, but is formed close to the trunk. Redberry juniper tends to have a central erect stem with lower branches originating near the ground level [5].

Raunkiaer Life Form (Raunkiaer 1934)

  • Phanerophyte

Seasonal Development

Redberry juniper is pollinated in late fall, and the ovulate cones mature in late spring [5]. Most juniper seeds germinate in spring [7].

Regeneration Processes

Redberry juniper reproduces by seed. Further information specific to reproduction in redberry juniper is not available. Pinchot juniper is one of the few juniper species known to sprout after top-kill, and it is closely related to redberry juniper. In most junipers germination may be delayed up to 2 years through embryo dormancy, seedcoat impermeability, or chemical inhibitors. Juniper seedling establishment is enhanced by light shade, which helps maintain adequate moisture [7].

Successional Status

Facultative Seral Species

Redberry juniper is intolerant of shade [7]. Junipers often invade grasslands and are gradually replaced by pinyons [7].

Immediate Fire Effects

Specific information on the immediate effect of fire on redberry juniper is lacking in the literature.

Postfire Regeneration Strategy (Stickney 1989)

  • Tree without adventitious-bud root crown
  • Secondary colonizer - off-site seed

Fire Adaptations

Redberry juniper occurs on juniper savannas, which are kept open by fire. Fires in these habitats tend to be surface fires carried by grasses, which burn so rapidly that heat levels lethal to large redberry juniper are rarely generated [7]. Fire-free intervals of 10 years or more are usually sufficient to allow juniper (Juniperus spp.) saplings to reach fire-resistant size: about 3 to 6 feet (1-2 m) [22]. Redberry juniper occurs in evergreen oak woodlands [11] which experience rapidly burning grass fires approximately every 10 to 20 years [22].

In some areas, junipers (probably including redberry juniper) are encroaching on grasslands that were historically kept clear of trees and shrubs by very frequent fires. Climatic changes and intensive livestock grazing have also been implicated in this encroachment [7].

Plant Response to Fire

No entry.

Fire Regimes

For fire regime information, search FEIS for this species by entering the species name on the Advanced Search page and selecting “Fire Regime” as the publication type.

Fire Management Considerations

No entry.

Federal Status

None

Other Status

None

Importance to Wildlife and Livestock

The fleshy, berry-like cones of redberry juniper are eaten by at least four species of songbirds, Gambel's quail, coyotes, foxes, raccoons, rock squirrels, Hopi chipmunks, and probably other birds and mammals [14,21].

Palatability and Nutritional Value

No entry.

Cover Value

No entry.

Value for Rehabilitation or Restoration of Disturbed Sites

No entry.

Other Uses

Redberry juniper wood is used locally for posts and fuel [21].

Juniper bark was used by Native Americans to make mats, saddles, and other items. They also used the seeds for beads or ground the fleshy cones for flour [14,21].

Other Management Considerations

No entry.

Table A1— Forest and range ecosystems, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) physiographic regions, Kuchler plant associations, Society for American Foresters (SAF) forest cover types, and Society for Rangeland Management (SRM) rangeland cover types in which this species occurs.

Forest and Range Ecosystems (Garrison et al. 1977)

  • FRES33 Southwestern shrubsteppe
  • FRES34 Chaparral - mountain shrub
  • FRES35 Pinyon - juniper
  • FRES40 Desert grasslands

BLM Physiographic Regions (Bernard and Brown 1977)

  • 7 Lower Basin and Range
  • 13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont

Kuchler Plant Associations (Kuchler 1964)

  • K023 Juniper - pinyon woodland
  • K031 Oak - juniper woodlands
  • K058 Grama - tobosa shrubsteppe
  • K059 Trans-Pecos shrub savanna

SAF Cover Types (Eyre 1980)

  • 66 Ashe - redberry (Pinchot) juniper
  • 239 Pinyon - juniper
  • 241 Western live oak

SRM Rangeland Cover Types (Shiflet 1994)

  • No entry.

1. Adams, Robert P.; Kistler, J. R. 1991. Hybridization between Juniperus erythrocarpa Cory and Juniperus pinchotii Sudworth in the Chisos Mountains, Texas. Southwestern Naturalist. 36(3): 295-301. [17084]

2. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]

3. Bowers, Janice E.; McLaughlin, Steven P. 1987. Flora and vegetation of the Rincon Mountains, Pima County, Arizona. Desert Plants. 8(2): 50-94. [495]

4. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]

5. Fletcher, Reggie A. 1985. Differentiation of Juniperus erythrocarpa and Juniperus monosperma. Range Notes No. 3. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region. 5 p. [22198]

6. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]

7. Gottfried, Gerald J. 1992. Ecology and management of the southwestern pinyon-juniper woodlands. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Bennett, Duane A.; [and others], technical coordinators. Ecology and management of oaks and associated woodlands: perspectives in the sw United States & n Mexico: Proceedings; 1992 April 27-30; Sierra Vista, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-218. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 78-86. [19745]

8. Hill, Alison. 1990. Ecology and classification of the pinyon-juniper woodlands in western New Mexico. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University. 75 p. Dissertation. In: Dissertation Abstracts International. 51(11): 5116-B. [1991]. [24518]

9. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]

10. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]

11. McPherson, Guy R. 1992. Ecology of oak woodlands in Arizona. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Bennett, Duane A.; [and others], technical coordinators. Ecology and management of oak and associated woodlands: perspectives in the sw United States & n Mexico: Proceedings; 1992 April 27-30; Sierra Vista, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-218. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 24-33. [19737]

12. Moir, W. H.; Carleton, J. O. 1987. Classification of pinyon-juniper (p-j) sites on National Forests in the Southwest. In: Everett, Richard L., compiler. Proceedings--pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16; Reno, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-215. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 216-226. [6852]

13. Pieper, Rex D. 1992. Species composition of woodland communities in the Southwest. In: Ffolliott, Peter F.; Gottfried, Gerald J.; Bennett, Duane A.; [and others], technical coordinators. Ecology and management of oak and assoiciated woodlands: perspectives in the sw United States & n Mexico: Proceedings; 1992 April 27-30; Sierra Vista, AZ. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-218. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 119-124. [19750]

14. Powell, A. Michael. 1988. Trees & shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks. Big Bend National Park, TX: Big Bend Natural History Association. 536 p. [6130]

15. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

16. Simpson, Benny J. 1988. A field guide to Texas trees. Austin, TX: Texas Monthly Press. 372 p. [11708]

17. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]

18. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]

19. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States, their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240]

20. Van Devender, Thomas R.; Mead, Jim I.; Rea, Amadeo M. 1991. Late Quaternary plants and vertebrates from Picacho Peak, Arizona. Southwestern Naturalist. 36(3): 302-314. [17089]

21. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. [7707]

22. Wright, Henry A.; Bailey, Arthur W. 1982. Fire ecology: United States and southern Canada. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 501 p. [2620]

23. Zanoni, Thomas A.; Adams, Robert P. 1975. The genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae) in Mexico and Guatemala: numerical and morphological analysis. Boletin de la Sociedad Botanica de Mexico. 35: 69-91. [20641]

24. Zanoni, Thomas A.; Adams, Robert P. 1976. The genus Juniperus in Mexico and Guatemala: numerical and chemosystematic analysis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 4: 147-158. [19991]

25. Zanoni, T. A. 1978. The American junipers of the section Sabina (Juniperus, Cupressaceae) -- a century later. Phytologia. 38(6): 433-454. [4954] 26. Flora of North America Association. 2000. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Volume 2: Pteridophytes and gymnosperms, [Online]. Available: http://hua.huh.harvard.edu/FNA/ [2003, August 12]. [36990]

27. Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. 1999. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Available: North Carolina Botanical Garden. In cooperation with the Nature Conservancy, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [2001, January 16]. [36715]

Last updated July 24, 2025