T
T
T
Species Review

Prunus serotina, black cherry

Written
October, 1991
Contributors
Ronald Uchytil - 1st Author

Uchytil, Ronald J. 1991. Prunus serotina, black cherry. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/species-reviews/pruser

AbbreviationCommon NameScientific NameClassificationStatus
Plants
PRUSERblack cherryPrunus serotinaLife Form: Plants/Tree
Kingdom: Plantae
Class: Dicot
Order: Rosales
Family: Rosaceae
Genus: Prunus
Fed. Protected: No
Nativity: Native
Invasiveness: Noninvasive

Taxonomy

The currently accepted scientific name of black cherry is Prunus serotina Ehrh. [34]. Recognized varieties found in the United States and Canada include:

  • Prunus serotina var. serotina, black cherry
  • Prunus serotina var. alabamensis (Mohr) Little, Alabama black cherry
  • Prunus serotina var. exima (Small) Little, escarpment black cherry
  • Prunus serotina var. rufula (Woot. & Standl) McVaugh, southwestern black cherry
  • Prunus serotina Ehrh. var. virens (Woot. & Standl.) McVaugh, black cherry

Synonyms

  • None

Other Common Names

wild black cherry, rum cherry, mountain black cherry, wild cherry

General Distribution

Black cherry grows in eastern North America from western Minnesota south to eastern Texas, and eastward to the Atlantic from central Florida to Nova Scotia [34]. Outlying populations grow in central Texas; in the mountains of western Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona; and south in Mexico to Guatemala [34]. The varieties are distributed as follows [34]:

  • typical black cherry (var. serotina) - from Nova Scotia west to central Minnesota, south to east Texas, and east to central Florida.
  • Alabama black cherry (var. alabamensis) - from eastern Georgia west to northeastern Alabama, and south to northwestern Florida. Also local in South Carolina and North Carolina.
  • escarpment cherry (var. exima) - found in the Edwards Plateau region of central Texas.
  • southwestern black cherry (var. rufula) - in the mountains from western Texas to central Arizona, and south to northern and central Mexico.

States and Provinces

  • United States: AL AZ AR CT DE FL GA IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO NE NH NJ NM NY NC OH OK PA RI SC TN TX VT VA WV WI
  • Canada: NB NS ON PQ
  • Mexico

Site Characteristics

Black cherry occurs in numerous mesic woods and second-growth hardwood forests in the eastern United States and Canada. It is also common in old fields and along fence rows. It grows on a variety of soil types, textures, and drainages but is most abundant on mesic sites [39]. Black cherry attains its greatest abundance on the Allegheny Plateau, where it is found on nearly all soil types. In this region it grows somewhat better on middle and lower slopes of eastern and northern exposures than on the dry soils associated with south- or west-facing slopes [39]. This mesophytic tendency becomes even more pronounced farther south. In the southern Appalachians, black cherry generally grows as scattered individuals with other mesophytic hardwoods and occasionally forms pure stands at high elevations [39]. In the Great Smoky Mountains, black cherry is best represented in cove forests below 5,500 feet (1,676 m) [63]. In southern Wisconsin, understory black cherry is a conspicuous component of xeric oak forests and savannas [5].

In the southwestern United States, black cherry is confined to canyons, valleys, and rich bottomlands [5,57].

Plant Communities

Black cherry occurs as scattered individuals in numerous forest types of the East (see SAF cover types in Table A1). It is codominant in only one cover type, the black cherry-maple type (SAF 28) found in the Allegheny Plateau and Allegheny Mountain sections of New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and West Virginia [18]. In this type, black cherry is a primary component along with red maple (Acer rubrum), sugar maple (A. saccharum), and white ash (Fraxinus americana). Other common associates include American beech (Fagus grandifolia), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), sweet birch (Betula lenta), yellow birch (B. alleghaniensis), tuliptree (Liriodendron tulipifera), cucumbertree (Magnolia acuminata), oak (Quercus spp.), and hickory (Carya spp.) [1,5,29,41].

Botanical Description

A photo of the brown, scaly bark of a tree in a forest.
Photo Credit
Photo by Steven Katovich, Bugwood.org.

Bark of a mature black cherry tree.

Black cherry is a deciduous, single-stemmed, medium- to large-sized tree. In the forest it typically has a large, straight, branch-free bole with a narrow crown, but in openings it tends to have a shorter trunk and a broad, irregular crown [26]. In the East, typical black cherry (var. serotina) may reach 125 feet (38 m) in height and 4 feet (1.2 m) or more in diameter [17]. Southwestern varieties are typically much smaller. Southwestern black cherry (var. rufula) seldom grows taller than 30 feet (9 m), and escarpment black cherry (var. exima) taller than 50 feet (15 m) [50].

Black cherry has a shallow and spreading root system. Most roots occur within 24 inches (61 cm) of the soil surface [39]. Bark on young stems is thin, smooth, and reddish-brown to nearly black. On large trunks the bark is fissured and scaly but remains thin [20,23]. Black cherry has simple, 2- to 6-inch-long, thick and leathery leaves [26]. White flowers occur in 3- to 4-inch-long, oblong-cylindric racemes at the end of leafy twigs of the season [17]. The fruit is a nearly globular, one-seeded, purplish-black to black, 0.5 inch (1.2 cm) diameter drupe [11,20]. The seed is an oblong-ovoid stone about 0.33 inch (0.75 cm) long [59].

Raunkiaer Life Form (Raunkiaer 1934)

  • Phanerophyte

Seasonal Development

Black cherry flowers in the spring when the leaves are one-half to fully expanded. Fruits develop over the spring and summer and ripen by early to late summer depending on latitude and climate. The fruits fall soon after ripening. Fruit maturation may vary by as much as 3 weeks on trees in the same stand [39]. Generalized timing of phenological events vary regionally as follows [8,39,46,50]:

Phenological eventNortheastSoutheastSouthwest
Floweringlate May-early JuneMarch-April
Fruits ripelate August-SeptemberJuneJune-August
Seedfalllate August-OctoberJune-early July

Regeneration Processes

Seed production

In natural stands maximum seed production occurs on 30- to 100-year-old trees. Some seed is produced almost every year, with good crops produced at 1- to 5-year intervals [39]. In Pennsylvania, large seed crops occur about every other year [8]. There are about 4,800 cleaned seeds per pound (10,560/kg) [39].

A close up photo of a tree's pointed green leaves and a cluster of small, shiny, dark red fruits.
Photo Credit
Creative Commons photo by Kent McFarland, iNaturalist.org.

Black cherry.

Dispersal

Seeds are dispersed by gravity, birds, and mammals. The fruits fall shortly after ripening in late summer or fall. Seeds not dispersed by animals generally land near the parent tree. Thus the abundance of seedlings in the understory is related to the number and distribution of seed trees in the overstory. Because of animal dispersal, however, black cherry seedlings are often abundant in stands with no or few seed-producing black cherry trees [1,15,29,41,51]. Germination tests show that black cherry seeds that pass through the digestive tracts of passerine birds successfully germinate after proper cold stratification, and have higher germination rates than undigested seeds [30,51].

Seed quality

Usually over 90 percent of seeds are sound [8,59].

Dormancy and germination

Black cherry seeds require cold stratification to germinate. This occurs as seeds overwinter on the forest floor [39]. Black cherry exhibits delayed germination: seeds from one crop germinate over a period of 3 years. Of seed artificially sown and buried 1 inch below the soil surface in a northern hardwood stand in Pennsylvania, 22, 42, and 4 percent germinated the first, second, and third year, respectively [36]. In another germination study, 10, 50, and 25 percent germinated 1, 2, and 3 years after burial, respectively [62]. Delayed germination allows black cherry to bank large amounts of seed in the forest floor. There are typically hundreds of thousands of black cherry seeds stored in the soil of black cherry-maple stands in Pennsylvania in any given year [36]. Each spring about one-half of these germinate.

Black cherry's moisture and light requirements for germination are not as exacting as those of its associates [44]. However, moist seedbeds ensure good germination. Seeds germinate in loose soil and forest litter, but germination is somewhat higher in litter than mineral soil [39,44].

Seedling growth and survival

Seedlings typically grow to a height of 2 to 4 inches (5-10 cm) 30 days after germination. In dense shade, they grow very slowly, sometimes reaching 6 inches (15 cm) in height in 3 or 4 years, but die thereafter unless released [39]. An understory of tiny black cherry seedlings is common in numerous mixed deciduous forests. If the canopy is opened due to windthrow, harvest, or other disturbance, the seedlings survive well and grow rapidly in full sunlight [39].

Vegetative reproduction

Black cherry sprouts vigorously from the stump following cutting or fire [32,55]. Sprouting frequency of stumps remains high, probably over 90 percent, for trees up to about 60 years of age [32].

Successional Status

Black cherry is a seral, shade-intolerant, gap-phase species [13]. It rarely occurs in the canopy of late successional deciduous forests but buried seed and seedlings are often present in the understory. Seedlings may survive in the understory for about 5 years but then die or die-back to the stem base unless released [5,39]. Seedlings that die are soon replaced because of the abundance of buried seed. Any disturbance which opens the canopy will release this bank of suppressed seedlings. Once released, young black cherry grow rapidly and quickly fill the gap, overtopping shade-tolerant associates.

Because of its abundant soil-stored seeds and prolific sprouting ability, black cherry dominates secondary succession following logging, fire, or wind-throw [44]. The Society of American Forester's black cherry - maple cover type (SAF 28) is a second-growth or intermediate successional stage created by widespread clearcutting at the turn of the century. This type is successional to beech-hemlock-sugar maple [18].

In bur and white oak (Quercus macrocarpa, Q. alba) woodlands in southern Wisconsin, black cherry accounts for about one-half of the total number of seedlings and saplings but is largely absent from the overstory. Under the shade of the oaks, black cherry saplings repeatedly die-back to the stem base and resprout. Black cherry can persist, by maintaining a small aboveground size, for 40 to 60 years until released [4,5].

Long-distance seed dispersal by birds is important in the establishment of black cherry along fence rows and into forest openings, old fields, and pine plantations [2,51].

Immediate Fire Effects

Black cherry's thin bark (about 0.2 inches [5 cm]) has poor insulating properties [23]. When the boles of black cherry trees were heated with a propane torch, the cambium reached lethal temperatures faster than any other eastern hardwood tested. The thin bark makes trees highly susceptible to girdling, and black cherry is usually killed or top-killed by fires of moderate severity. Trees larger than about 4 to 6 inches in diameter, however, may survive light surface fires [39,45,48].

The effects of fire on black cherry vary depending on fire severity and stem diameter. A large percentage of seedlings and saplings are generally top-killed by low-severity fires, but larger individuals may be unaffected. As fire severity increases, the percentage of tree-sized individuals killed also increases.

An April prescribed fire in a south-central Wisconsin bur and white oak savanna killed only 2 out of 141 black cherry seedlings and saplings. The others either resprouted, suffered only partial scarring, or were unharmed. The percentage of foliage killed was inversely related to stem diameter. Nearly all seedlings were top-killed, but only a small percentage of plants 4 inches (10 cm) d.b.h. were affected. In general, black cherry was more susceptible to fire damage than either species of oak [25].

Low-intensity prescribed surface fires (mean flame length > 1 foot [0.3 m], mean rate of spread of 10.8 feet [3.3 m] per minute) in a 30-year-old mixed hardwood stand in central Wisconsin top-killed 67 to 100 percent of saplings less than 4 inches (10 cm) d.b.h., but did not top-kill any black cherry greater than 4 inches (10 cm) d.b.h. One year after the fire, seedling density was reduced by about 35 percent, from 11,400 to 7,500 per acre (28,250-18,500/ha) [48].

Following a wildfire in south-central New York, 12 percent of 4 inch (10 cm) d.b.h. and smaller black cherry in old fields were killed. The rest were top-killed and later sprouted [53].

In longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) stands in Alabama, two summer prescribed burns spaced 2 years apart killed small black cherry less than 1 inch d.b.h. These plants sprouted after the first fire but not after the second [10].

Following an early spring, low-intensity prescribed fire in a young black oak (Quercus velutina)-black cherry forest in Connecticut, about 15 percent of 1- to 4-inch-diameter black cherry were top-killed. No 4- to 6-inch-diameter trees were affected [45].

Postfire Regeneration Strategy (Stickney 1989)

  • survivor species; on-site surviving root crown or caudex

Fire Adaptations

Black cherry is very susceptible to fire injury but typically resprouts from the root crown or stump [55].

Considerable amounts of black cherry seed are stored in the soil [36]. The seed's stony endocarp and the soil provide some insulation from fire [22]. Although not documented, some soil-stored seeds presumably survive at least light fires and contribute to postfire seedling establishment.

Birds and animals may distribute some seed into burned areas. However, as a means of postfire recovery, this is probably of minor importance.

Plant Response to Fire

Black cherry typically sprouts when aboveground portions are killed by fire. It is generally considered a prolific sprouter. Each top-killed individual produces several sprouts that grow rapidly.

In 4- to 6-year-old northern Alabama clearcuts, black cherry saplings and coppice sprouts regenerated quickly following top-killing broadcast burns. Three to four years after burning, the density and frequency of stems greater than 4.5 feet (1.4 m) tall was about equal to preburn levels [28].

In North Carolina, 1-inch-diameter (2.5 cm) black cherry that were top-killed following a winter prescribed fire quickly sprouted, producing an average of eight sprouts per stump. Black cherry sprouts grew faster than all other hardwood sprouts on the study area. The average height of the tallest black cherry sprout on each stump was 5.8 feet (1.7 m) 1 year after burning [49].

In oldfields in New York, black cherry seedlings top-killed by fire averaged 4.4 sprouts per stump [53].

In south-central Wisconsin oak savanna, black cherry seedlings and saplings top-killed by fire had 1 to 16 sprouts per stump. In general, black cherry's sprouting response was vigorous, producing larger and more numerous sprouts than than black, white, or bur oak [25].

The Research Project Summary "Effects of surface fires in a mixed red and eastern white pine stand in Michigan" and the Research Paper by Bowles and others 2007 provide information on prescribed fire and postfire response of several plant species, including black cherry, that was not available when this species review was written.

Fire Regimes

For fire regime information, search FEIS for this species by entering the species name or acronym on the home page and selecting “Fire Regime” as the publication type.

Fire Management Considerations

Black cherry does not require scarified seedbeds. Controlled burning following timber harvest is not necessary for black cherry regeneration [41].

Black cherry sprouts prolifically following fire. However, this depletes its underground carbohydrate reserves and leaves it in a weakened condition. A second fire within a year or two would probably kill any seedlings and saplings that survived the first fire by resprouting [10,25].

Federal Status

None

Other Status

No entry.

Importance to Wildlife and Livestock

Black cherry leaves, twigs, bark, and seeds are poisonous to livestock. They contain a cyanogenic glycoside which breaks down during digestion into hydrocyanic acid [52]. Most livestock poisoning apparently comes from eating wilted leaves, which contain more of the toxin than fresh leaves do. One author speculated that more livestock are killed from eating black cherry than from any other plant [17]. White-tailed deer eat the leaves and twigs without harm, and browse small to moderate amounts of seedlings and saplings [39].

Black cherry fruits are important mast for numerous species of birds and mammals. Numerous songbirds feed on black cherries as they migrate south in the fall. Passerine birds that make considerable use of black cherry fruits include the American robin, brown thrasher, mockingbird, eastern bluebird, European starling, gray catbird, blue jay, willow flycatcher, northern cardinal, American crow, and waxwings, thrushes, woodpeckers, grackles, grosbeaks, sparrows, and vireos [42,43]. Black cherries are also important in the summer and fall diets of the ruffed grouse, sharp-tailed grouse, wild turkey, northern bobwhite, and greater and lesser prairie chicken [33,39,58]. The red fox, raccoon, opossum, and squirrels and rabbits also eat the fruit [58]. Black cherries have been described as a favorite food of black bears [11].

Palatability and Nutritional Value

Black cherry is moderately palatable to white-tailed deer; they prefer sugar maple, white ash, yellow birch, yellow-poplar, and pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica) [37,54].

The fruits are highly palatable to songbirds, upland game birds, and mammals [42,58,59].

The twigs of black cherry seedlings and saplings are high in protein. In Pennsylvania, the protein content of twig sections in mid-April was about 24 percent for the bud, 15 percent for the terminal 1 inch (2.5 cm) section, and 13 percent the terminal 1 to 2 inch section (2.5-5 cm) [12].

Cover Value

No entry.

Value for Rehabilitation or Restoration of Disturbed Sites

Black cherry is used for surface mine spoil reclamation in the East. Best results are obtained by planting 1-year-old or older nursery grown seedlings. Direct seeding has generally been unsuccessful. In Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma, 30-year-old plantings at 9 sites averaged 22 percent survival, 5.2 inches d.b.h. (13 cm), and 36 feet (11 m) in height [60].

Methods for collecting, extracting, cleaning, storing, and sowing black cherry seed to produce nursery grown seedlings are available [21,59].

Other Uses

Black cherry bark was used historically in the Appalachians as a cough remedy, tonic, and sedative. The fruit was also used to flavor rum and brandy. Pitted fruits are edible, and are eaten raw and used in wine and jelly [39].

Wood Products Value: Black cherry is an important commercial tree. The rich reddish-brown wood is strong, hard, and close-grained. It works well and finishes smoothly, making it one of the most valued cabinet and furniture woods in North America [59]. Black cherry wood is also used for paneling, interior trim, veneers, handles, crafts, toys, and scientific instruments [17,58]. Black cherry's commercial range, where large numbers of high-quality trees are found, is restricted to the Allegheny Plateau of Pennsylvania, New York, and West Virginia [39].

Other Management Considerations

Silviculture: Black cherry regenerates best under even-aged silvicultural treatments [39,40,41]. Clearcutting is generally used where advanced regeneration is abundant. Shelterwood cuts are used where seedlings are scarce and provide good conditions for establishment from soil-stored seed. Soil scarification following cutting is not necessary.

Animal damage: Following timber harvest, black cherry seedlings generally suffer less browsing damage by deer than associated hardwoods because they are less palatable [54]. However, black cherry stocking can be reduced or completely eliminated where deer populations are high. In some instances, successful regeneration can only be assured where advanced seedlings are so abundant that deer cannot eat them all [39]. Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer applications 2 years after harvest cause black cherry seedlings to quickly outgrow the reach of deer [3].

Competing vegetation: Competing herbaceous vegetation, such as bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), hayscented fern (Dennstaedtia punctilobula), whorled wood aster (Aster accuminatus), flat-topped aster (A. umbellatus), goldenrod (Solidigo rugosa), and wild oatgrass (Danthonia compressa), are often favored by shelterwood cuts. These species inhibit black cherry seed germination and seedling growth through allelopathy [16,27]. They are effectively controlled with herbicides which also kill black cherry seedlings. However, black cherry seed in the soil is not affected by herbicide treatments, and new seedlings establish after spraying [37].

Control: Black cherry under 3 feet (0.9 m) tall is susceptible to 2,4,5-T, but slightly more tolerant of 2,4-D. Basal bark treatments with these herbicides kill trees over 10 feet (3 m) tall [44]. Black cherry is killed by soil treatments of Bromacil, Fenuron, Karbutilate, and Picloram [9].

Insects and Diseases: The most serious defoliating insects affecting black cherry are the eastern tent caterpillar and the cherry scallop shell moth. Infestations of these insects are sporadically heavy and cause growth loss and occasional mortality. Numerous borers and beetles cause gum defects but are seldom fatal. Black knot, a fungal disease which causes elongated rough black swellings much larger than the stem, is common in black cherry. In Pennsylvania, Cytospora leucostoma causes a canker disease resulting in widespread branch mortality. Numerous root and butt rotting fungi have been reported in black cherry; however, decay generally spreads more slowly in cherry than associated trees. See Marquis [39] for a complete discussion of insects and diseases of black cherry.

Wind damage: Because it is shallow-rooted and has a tendency to overtop its associates in mixed stands, black cherry is susceptible to windthrow [39].

Table A1— Forest and range ecosystems, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) physiographic regions, Kuchler plant associations, Society for American Foresters (SAF) forest cover types, and Society for Rangeland Management (SRM) rangeland cover types in which this species occurs.

Forest and Range Ecosystems (Garrison et al. 1977)

  • FRES10 White - red - jack pine
  • FRES11 Spruce - fir
  • FRES12 Longleaf - slash pine
  • FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine
  • FRES14 Oak - pine
  • FRES15 Oak - hickory
  • FRES17 Elm - ash - cottonwood
  • FRES18 Maple - beech - birch
  • FRES19 Aspen - birch
  • FRES32 Texas savanna

BLM Physiographic Regions (Bernard and Brown 1977)

  • 7 Lower Basin and Range
  • 13 Rocky Mountain Piedmont
  • 14 Great Plains

Kuchler Plant Associations (Kuchler 1964)

  • K062 Mesquite - live oak savanna
  • K081 Oak savanna
  • K084 Cross Timbers
  • K086 Juniper - oak savanna
  • K087 Mesquite - oak savanna
  • K089 Black Belt
  • K097 Southeastern spruce - fir forest
  • K100 Oak - hickory forest
  • K101 Elm - ash forest
  • K102 Beech - maple forest
  • K103 Mixed mesophytic forest
  • K104 Appalachian oak forest
  • K106 Northern hardwoods
  • K109 Transition between K104 and K106
  • K110 Northeastern oak - pine forest
  • K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest
  • K112 Southern mixed forest
  • K115 Sand pine scrub
  • K116 Subtropical pine forest

SAF Cover Types (Eyre 1980)

  • 14 Northern pin oak
  • 17 Pin cherry
  • 19 Gray birch - red maple
  • 20 White pine - northern red oak - red maple
  • 21 Eastern white pine
  • 22 White pine - hemlock
  • 23 Eastern hemlock
  • 25 Sugar maple - beech - yellow birch
  • 27 Sugar maple
  • 28 Black cherry - maple
  • 31 Red spruce - sugar maple - beech
  • 34 Red spruce - Fraser fir
  • 40 Post oak - blackjack oak
  • 42 Bur oak
  • 43 Bear oak
  • 44 Chestnut oak
  • 45 Pitch pine
  • 51 White pine - chestnut oak
  • 52 White oak - black oak - northern red oak
  • 55 Northern red oak
  • 57 Yellow-poplar
  • 59 Yellow-poplar - white oak - northern red oak
  • 60 Beech - sugar maple
  • 64 Sassafras - persimmon
  • 66 Ashe juniper - redberry (Pinchot) juniper
  • 68 Mesquite
  • 70 Longleaf pine
  • 82 Loblolly pine - hardwood
  • 83 Longleaf pine - slash pine
  • 85 Slash pine - hardwood
  • 108 Red maple
  • 109 Hawthorn
  • 110 Black oak

SRM Rangeland Cover Types (Shiflet 1994)

  • No entry.

1. Adams, Dwight E.; Anderson, Roger C. 1980. Species response to a moisture gradient in central Illinois forests. American Journal of Botany. 67(3): 381-392. [13295]

2. Artigas, Francisco J.; Boerner, Ralph E. J. 1989. Advance regeneration and seed banking of woody plants in Ohio pine plantations: implications for landscape change. Landscape Ecology. 2(3): 139-150. [13633]

3. Auchmoody, L. R. 1982. Response of young black cherry stands to fertilization. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 12(2): 319-325. [12520]

4. Auclair, Allan N. 1975. Sprouting response in Prunus serotina Erhr.: Multivariate analysis of site, forest structure and growth rate relationships. American Midland Naturalist. 94(1): 72-87. [15802]

5. Auclair, Allan N.; Cottam, Grant. 1971. Dynamics of black cherry (Prunus serotina Erhr.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. Ecological Monographs. 41(2): 153-177. [8102]

6. Beck, Donald E. 1988. Clearcutting and other regeneration options for upland hardwoods. In: Proceedings, 16th annual hardwood symposium of the Hardwood Research Council; 1988 May 15-18; Chashiers, NC. Vol. 16. [Place of publication unknown]. Hardwood Research Council: 44-54. [10903]

7. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]

8. Bjorkbom, J. C. 1979. Seed production and advance regeneration in Allegheny hardwood forests. Res. Pap. NE-435. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 10 p. [12526]

9. Bovey, Rodney W. 1977. Response of selected woody plants in the United States to herbicides. Agric. Handb. 493. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 101 p. [8899]

10. Boyer, William D. 1990. Growing-season burns for control of hardwoods in longleaf pine stands. Res. Pap. SO-256. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 7 p. [14604]

11. Chapman, William K.; Bessette, Alan E. 1990. Trees and shrubs of the Adirondacks. Utica, NY: North Country Books, Inc. 131 p. [12766]

12. Cowan, R. L.; Jordan, J. S.; Grimes, J. L.; Gill, J. D. 1970. Comparative nutritive values of forage species. In: Range and wildlife habitat evaluation--a research symposium: Proceedings; 1968 May; Flagstaff; Tempe, AZ. Misc. Publ. 1147. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 48-56. [12985]

13. Curtis, John T. 1959. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. 657 p. [7116]

14. de Bruyn, Peter; Buckner, Edward. 1981. Prescribed fire on sloping terrain in west Tennessee to maintain loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). In: Barnett, James P., ed. Proceedings, 1st biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 1980 November 6-7; Atlanta, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-34. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 67-69. [12091]

15. Downs, Julie A.; Abrams, Marc D. 1991. Composition and structure of an old-growth versus a second-growth white oak forest in southwestern Pennsylvania. In: McCormick, Larry H.; Gottschalk, Kurt W., eds. Proceedings, 8th central hardwood forest conference; 1991 March 4-6; University Park, PA. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-148. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 207-223. [15313]

16. Drew, Allan P. 1988. Interference of black cherry by ground flora of the Allegheny uplands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 18: 652-656. [8729]

17. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1988. Trees of the southeastern United States. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 322 p. [12764]

18. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]

19. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]

20. Godfrey, Robert K. 1988. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of northern Florida and adjacent Georgia and Alabama. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 734 p. [10239]

21. Grisez, Ted J. 1974. Prunus L. cherry, peach, and plum. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., technical coordinator. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agriculture Handbook No. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 658-673. [6975]

22. Hare, Robert C. 1961. Heat effects on living plants. Occ. Pap. 183. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 32 p. [6708]

23. Hare, Robert C. 1965. Contribution of bark to fire resistance of southern trees. Journal of Forestry. 63(4): 248-251. [9915]

24. Henderson, Richard. 1983. Fire tolerance of black cherry and black oak saplings in a savanna. Restoration & Management Notes. 1(4): 17. [16791]

25. Wade, D. D.; Lundsford, J. 1990. Fire as a forest management tool: prescribed burning in the southern United States. Unasylva. 41: 28-38. [16792]

26. Hosie, R. C. 1969. Native trees of Canada. 7th ed. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Forestry Service, Department of Fisheries and Forestry. 380 p. [3375]

27. Horsley, Stephen B. 1977. Allelopathic inhibition of black cherry by fern (Pteridium aquilinum), grass, goldenrod (Solidago rugosa) and aster (Aster umbellatus). Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 7: 205-216. [10001]

28. Huntley, Jimmy C.; McGee, Charles E. 1981. Timber and wildlife implications of fire in young upland hardwoods. In: Barnett, James P., ed. Proceedings, 1st biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 1980 November 6-7; Atlanta, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-34. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 56-66. [12080]

29. Jones, Steven M. 1988. Old-growth forests within the Piedmont of South Carolina. Natural Areas Journal. 8(1): 31-37. [11008]

30. Krefting, Laurits W.; Roe, Eugene I. 1949. The role of some birds and mammals in seed germination. Ecological Monographs. 19(3): 269-286. [8847]

31. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]

32. Lamson, Neil I. 1988. Role of stump sprouts in regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands. In: Smith, H. Clay; Perkey, Arlyn W.; Kidd, William E., Jr., eds. Guidelines for regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands: Workshop proceedings; 1988 May 24-26; Morgantown, WV. SAF Publ. 88-03. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Books: 31-37. [13932]

33. Landers, J. Larry. 1981. The role of fire in bobwhite quail management. In: Wood, Gene W., ed. Prescribed fire and wildlife in southern forests: Proceedings of a symposium; 1981 April 6-8; Myrtle Beach, SC. Georgetown, SC: Clemson University, Belle W. Baruch Forest Science Institute: 73-80. [14812]

34. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. [2952]

35. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]

36. Marquis, David A. 1975. Seed storage and germination under northern hardwood forests. Canadian Journal of Forestry Resources. 5: 478-484. [6684]

37. Marquis, David A. 1983. Regeneration of black cherry in the Alleghenies. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Hardwood Symposium - Hardwood Research Council; [Date of conference unknown]; Asheville, NC. Asheville, NC: Hardwood Research Council: 106-119. [12744]

38. Marquis, David A. 1988. Guidelines for regenerating cherry-maple stands. In: Smith, H. Clay; Perkey, Arlyn W.; Kidd, William E., Jr., eds. Guidelines for regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands: Workshop proceedings; 1988 May 24-26; Morgantown, WV. SAF Publ. 88-03. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Books: 167-188. [13944]

39. Marquis, David A. 1990. Prunus serotina Ehrh. black cherry. In: Burns, Russell M.; Honkala, Barbara H., technical coordinators. Silvics of North America. Volume 2. Hardwoods. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 594-604. [13972]

40. Marquis, David A.; Ernst, Richard L.; Stout, Susan L. 1984. Prescribing silvicultural treatments in hardwood stands of the Alleghenies. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-96. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 90 p. [14477]

41. Marquis, David A.; Gearhart, Porter. 1983. Cherry-maple. In: Burns, Russell M., tech. comp. Silvicultural systems for the major forest types of the United States. Agric. Handb. No. 445. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 137-140. [12655]

42. Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 500 p. [4021]

43. Morden-Moore, Andrea L.; Willson, Mary F. 1982. On the ecological significance of fruit color in Prunus serotina and Rubus occidentalis: field experiments. Canadian Journal of Botany. 60: 1554-1560. [12608]

44. Mulligan, Gerald A.; Munro, Derek B. 1981. The biology of Canadian weeds, 51. Prunus virginiana L. and P. serotina Ehrh. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 61(4): 977-992. [12540]

45. Niering, William A.; Goodwin, Richard H.; Taylor, Sally. 1971. Prescribed burning in southern New England: introduction to long-range studies. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1970 August 20-21; Fredericton, NB. No. 10. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 267-286. [15704]

46. Powell, A. Michael. 1988. Trees & shrubs of Trans-Pecos Texas including Big Bend and Guadalupe Mountains National Parks. Big Bend National Park, TX: Big Bend Natural History Association. 536 p. [6130]

47. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]

48. Reich, Peter B.; Abrams, Marc D.; Ellsworth, David S.; [and others]. 1990. Fire affects ecophysiology and community dynamics of central Wisconsin oak forest regeneration. Ecology. 71(6): 2179-2190. [13326]

49. Sanders, D. L.; Van Lear, D. H.; Guynn, D. C. 1987. Prescribed burning in mature pine-hardwood stands--effects on hardwoods and small mammals. In: Phillips, Douglas R., compiler. Proceedings, 4th biennial southern silvicultural research conference; 1987 November 4-6; Atlanta, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-42. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 93-96. [15668]

50. Simpson, Benny J. 1988. A field guide to Texas trees. Austin, TX: Texas Monthly Press. 372 p. [11708]

51. Smith, Albert J. 1975. Invasion and ecesis of bird-disseminated woody plants in a temperate forest sere. Ecology. 56(1): 19-34. [15667]

52. Stephens, H. A. 1980. Poisonous plants of the central United States. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas. 165 p. [3803]

53. Swan, Frederick R., Jr. 1970. Post-fire response of four plant communities in south-central New York state. Ecology. 51(6): 1074-1082. [3446]

54. Tilghman, Nancy G. 1989. Impacts of white-tailed deer on forest regeneration in northwestern Pennsylvania. Journal of Wildlife Management. 53(3): 524-532. [8914]

55. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region. 1989. Final environmental impact statement. Vegetation management in the Coastal Plain/Piedmont. Vol. 1. Management Bulletin R8-MB-23. Atlanta, GA. 351 p. [10220]

56. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]

57. Van Auken, O. W.; Ford, A. L.; Allen, J. L. 1981. An ecological comparison of upland deciduous and evergreen forests of central Texas. American Journal of Botany. 68(9): 1249-1256. [10559]

58. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States, their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240]

59. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. [7707]

60. Vogel, Willis G. 1981. A guide for revegetating coal minesoils in the eastern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-68. Broomall, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 190 p. [15575]

61. Vogl, R. J. 1964. The effects of fire on the vegetational composition of bracken-grassland. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters. 53: 67-82. [9142]

62. Wendel, G. W. 1972. Longevity of black cherry seed in the forest floor. Res. Note NE-149. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 4 p. [15666]

63. Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs. 26(1): 1-79. [11108]

Last updated June 9, 2025