Download (PDF 224 KB): https://research.fs.usda.gov/download/treesearch/29376.pdf
Abstract
We examined effects of a first nitrogen (N) fertilizer application on upper-canopy needle morphology and gas exchange in ~20-m-tall loblolly pine (
Pinus taeda L.) exposed to elevated carbon dioxide concentration ([CO
2]) for 9 years. Duke Forest free-air CO
2 enrichment (FACE) plots were split and half of each ring fertilized with 112 kg ha–1 elemental N applied in two applications in March and April 2005. Measurements of needle length (L), mass per unit area (LMA), N concentration (N
l) on a mass and an area basis, light-saturated net photosynthesis per unit leaf area (A
a) and per unit mass (A>sub>m), and leaf conductance (g
L) began after the second fertilizer application in existing 1-year-old foliage (F
O) and later in developing current-year first-flush (F
C1) and current-year second- flush (F
C2) foliage. Elevated [CO
2] increased A
a by 43 and 52% in F
O and F
C1 foliage, respectively, but generally had no significant effect on any other parameter. Fertilization had little or no significant effect on L, LMA, A or g
L in F
O foliage; although N
l was significantly higher in fertilized trees by midsummer. In contrast, fertilization resulted in large increases in L, N
l, and A in F
C1 and F
C2 foliage, increasing
a by about 20%. These results suggest that, although both needle age classes accumulate N following fertilization, they use it differently— current-year foliage incorporates N into photosynthetic machinery, whereas 1-year-old foliage serves as an N store. There were no significant interaction effects of elevated [CO
2] and fertilization on A. Elevated [CO
2] increased the intercept of the A:N
l relationship but did not significantly affect the slope of the relationship in either foliage age class.
Citation
Maier, Chris A.; Palmroth, Sari; Ward, Eric. 2008. Short-term effects of fertilization on photosynthesis and leaf morphology of field-grown loblolly pine following long-term exposure to elevated CO
2 concentration. Tree Physiology, Vol. 28: 597-606