Download (PDF 979 KB): https://research.fs.usda.gov/download/treesearch/65455.pdf
Abstract
There is considerable interest in multiaged management as a silvicultural and restoration tool in redwood forests of California. For multiaged silviculture to be successful, a new cohort of trees must first be able to regenerate underneath the residual overstory. We used annual re-measurement data from a replicated manipulative experiment in coastal northern California to determine how understory light, stand density, and spatial arrangement of residual trees affected coast redwood (
Sequoia sempervirens) and tanoak (
Notholithocarpus densiflorus) stump sprouts regenerating after partial harvest of conifers and felling-to-waste of tanoak. Four treatments (group selection, aggregated retention, low-density dispersed retention, and high-density dispersed retention) were applied at each replicate on redwood-dominated sites. Height growth of redwood sprouts was 49% greater than tanoak sprouts across all treatments. Redwood and tanoak sprouts were sensitive to overstory density. Redwood sprouts were marginally taller under high-density aggregated versus dispersed overstory trees at the same residual stand density (39.5 m
2/ha BA). Sprout growth correlated with understory light; redwood sprouts exhibited a significant increase in sensitivity to light availability from year 2 to year 6. No differences in redwood sprout growth were detected when retaining a residual tree on the same root system versus sprouts growing on a root system where all redwood stems were cut. Our finding that cutting unwanted hardwoods in tandem with partial harvesting of merchantable conifers can maintain a competitive advantage for redwood sprouts versus tanoaks is an important consideration for maintaining redwood dominance when transitioning to multiaged management.
Citation
Muma, Robert; Webb, Lynn A.; Zald, Harold S.J.; Boston, Kevin; Dagley, Christa M.; Berrill, John-Pascal. 2022. Dynamics of stump sprout regeneration after transformation to multiaged management in coast redwood forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 515(9): 120236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120236.