T
T
T
Fire Study - Management Project Summary

Response of woody species to crown fires in oak-juniper woodlands (Texas)

Written
December, 2012
Study Authors
Reemts and Hansen
Contributors
Charlotte Reemts - 1st Compiler
Fire Study Type
Management Project Summary

Introduction

Sources

Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this Management Project Summary comes from previously unpublished data and the following paper:

  • Reemts, Charlotte M.; Hansen, Laura L. 2008. Slow recolonization of burned oak-juniper woodlands by Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei): ten years of succession after crown fire. Forest Ecology and Management. 255(3-4): 1057-1066 [4].

Common names of plant species are used throughout this summary. For a complete list of the common and scientific names of plant species discussed, see the Appendix.

Project Description

Objectives

We initiated this study to examine the response of oak-juniper woodlands to wildfire. Mature oak-juniper woodlands are important habitat for the federally endangered golden-cheeked warbler, while early-successional oak shrublands are nesting habitat for the federally endangered black-capped vireo. Managers knew little about the succession of woodlands after fire and were concerned about balancing the habitat needs of the 2 bird species.

Location

Fort Hood Military Reservation, Fort Hood, Texas. Bell and Coryell counties. 31.27 latitude, -97.66 longitude, radius 10 km.

Map of Texas showing the location of Fort Hood (near the center of the state), the location of wildfires that occurred in 1996 and 2009, and the location of transects used to study fire effects on vegetation.

Figure 1—Location of wildfires and study transects.

Site Description and Condition

The burned area is in somewhat dissected terrain and includes lowlands, slopes (all aspects), and mesa tops. Elevation ranges from 235 to 300 meters above sea level. Climate is humid subtropical. Average high temperature in August is 36ºC; average high temperature in January is 14ºC. Average annual precipitation is 838 mm, with two rainy seasons (May-June and October).

Fire effects were studied on three soil types (a detailed description of the study design and methods can be found Reemts and Hansen [4]. Evant soils are found on rolling hills, with slopes generally less than 10 degrees. These are the deepest soils studied, with depths from 36 to 51 cm. Eckrant soils are shallow (10 to 51 cm deep, but usually less than 30 cm) and found on flat, rocky limestone mesa tops. Real soils are found on slopes and slope shoulders, usually downslope from Eckrant soils. Slopes can be as steep as 45 degrees but are usually 10-20 degrees. Soil depths range from 20 to 48 cm (usually less than 30 cm).

The study area was wooded before the fires and was essentially unmanaged. Military training is confined to large grassy openings in the woodlands and to roads within the woodlands. The area is grazed, but the natural understory of the woodlands is very sparse and cattle generally only use the woodlands for cover.

The February 1996 wildfire was preceded by 3 years of approximately average rainfall (800 mm/yr; Figure 1). Rainfall following the fire was average to above average. The April 2009 wildfire occurred in a year of above-average rainfall, but was preceded and followed by droughts.

Line graph showing total annual precipitation from 1990 to 2011, which fluctuates from about 500 mm to more than 1,200 mm in any given year.

Figure 2—Total annual precipitation from 1990 to 2011 for the study area. Wildfire years are marked with red dashed lines.

Treatment Descriptions

After the first wildfire, transects were randomly located in moderately to severely burned areas. These transects were sampled every summer from 1996 to 2002, and again in 2005 and 2010. The second wildfire re-burned some of these transects; these twice-burned transects were sampled each summer from 2009 to 2011. In this report, the first summer after each fire is identified as “postfire year 0”; thus, transects were measured in postfire years 0-6, 9, and 14 after the 1st fire and in postfire years 0-2 after the 2nd fire. Control (unburned) transects were selected in areas adjacent to the wildfires on similar soils, slopes, and aspects. Unburned transects were sampled in 2001, 2005, and 2010. The table below may be helpful for relating calendar years to postfire years.

Table 1—Treatment years and timing relative to fires.
Treatment yearYears after 1st fireYears after 2nd fire
19960
19971
19982
19993
20004
20015
20026
20059
2009130
2010141
2011152

Pretreatment Plant Community

Prefire communities varied by soil type. None of these woodlands had been burned since the creation of Fort Hood in the 1940s, and most of them are visible on aerial imagery taken in 1937. Little is known about their fire history before that time.

On Evant soils, the community was a post oak-Ashe juniper woodland. Blackjack oak is present but uncommon. The shrub layer is diverse and includes Texas ash, eastern poison-ivy, saw greenbrier, gum bumelia, stretchberry, and possumhaw. Canopy cover was generally above 50% but varied greatly. The understory beneath the trees is generally sparse (~5%); cedar-sedge (Carex planostachys) is the most common species. In canopy openings, additional grass species include threeawns, dropseeds, sideoats grama, and Texas wintergrass. Historically, these communities were likely post oak savannas that have since been invaded by Ashe juniper to form woodlands.

Eckrant soils are dominated by bastard oak-Ashe juniper woodlands or shrublands. Other common canopy species include Texas ash, Texas live oak, and Buckley's oak. The shrub layer includes mescal bean, eastern poison-ivy, stretchberry, Texas redbud, saw greenbrier, evergreen sumac, sweet mountain grape, possumhaw, Texas persimmon, and gum bumelia. Canopy cover was generally above 50%, with bare patches around bedrock outcrops. Understory cover is sparse (~5%) and confined largely to openings in the canopy. Common species include cedar-sedge, composite dropseed, and rosette grasses. Historically, these soils supported a mix of bastard oak shrublands and oak-juniper woodlands, depending on the local fire history and soil depth.

Community composition on the Real soils is somewhat more variable. On drier slopes, Buckley's oak and Ashe juniper codominate; Texas ash is also common. On mesic slopes, Ashe juniper becomes less dominant, and the deciduous component becomes more diverse. Additional species include chinquapin oak, hackberries, and walnuts. The shrub layer includes eastern poison-ivy, sweet mountain grape, Texas redbud, saw greenbrier, Carolina buckthorn, mescal bean, Spanish grape, dewberry, Texas persimmon, and possumhaw. Canopy cover is generally above 75% with openings around bedrock outcrops. Understory cover is sparse (~5%) and includes cedar-sedge and rosette grasses. Woodlands on these slopes are generally similar to those found historically.

The woodlands are surrounded by grasslands and oak savannas. On Evant soils, savannas are dominated by post oak, while Texas live oak is dominant on most other soils. Grasslands were historically dominated by little bluestem and sideoats grama; yellow bluestem is codominant to dominant in most areas.

Pretreatment Fuels

Little information was available about fuels in these woodlands at the time of the wildfires.

Historical Fire Regime

Study sites are classified in the plant community and probably historically experienced the fire regime described in table 2.

Table 2—Fire regime information on the vegetation community studied in this Research Project Summary. Fire regime characteristics are taken from the LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Vegetation Model [3], which was developed by local experts using available literature and expert opinion. Dashes indicate that information was not available in the Rapid Assessment Vegetation Model.
Vegetation Community
(Potential Natural Vegetation Group)
Fire severity*Percent of firesMean fire interval
(years)
Minimum fire interval
(years)
Maximum fire interval
(years)
Oak woodland-shrubland-grassland mosaicReplacement11%50
Mixed56%10
Surface or low33%17
*Fire Severities:
Replacement=Any fire that causes greater than 75% top removal of a vegetation-fuel type, resulting in general replacement of existing vegetation; may or may not cause a lethal effect on the plants.
Mixed=Any fire burning more than 5% of an area that does not qualify as a replacement, surface, or low-severity fire; includes mosaic and other fires that are intermediate in effects.
Surface or low=Any fire that causes less than 25% upper layer replacement and/or removal in a vegetation-fuel class but burns 5% or more of the area [1,2].

Fire Description

Season and Severity Classification

Both wildfires were started in grasslands by military training activities. High winds moved the fires into the woodlands, where they burned largely as crown fires with areas of lower severity. Little information is available about fire weather or fire activity. The 1996 fire jumped across a 4-lane highway and burned through more than 4,000 ha of woodland, including 2,800 ha of golden-cheeked warbler habitat. Average high temperature during the fire was 24.4 ºC (36.5 ºC for the first 3 days). The 2009 fire was considerably smaller, but it still jumped across a 2-lane road. Average high temperature during the fire was 24.6 ºC. The 2nd fire did not burn through any transects on Evant soils.

Table 3—Fire descriptions.
YearSeasonOverall severityVegetation*Substrate*
1996Winter
(2 February–7 March)
Mixed-severity crown fire50% severely burned
35% moderately burned
20% severely burned
70% moderately burned
2009Spring
(3 April–12 April)
Mixed-severity crown fire30% moderately burned
50% lightly burned
45% moderately burned
45% lightly burned
*Transects were located ONLY in moderately to severely burned areas following the 1996 fire. Fire severity was measured in 7 plots along each transect using National Park Service methods [5]. Monitoring in 2009 was done on the same transects used following the 1996 fire.

Plant Phenology

The 1996 fire occurred before most species had leafed out. The 2009 fire occurred shortly after most species had leafed out.

Wildfire Effects

The first wildfire had relatively small effects on understory density (stems ≤ 1.8 m tall) but much larger effects overstory density (stems > 1.8 m tall). On Evant soils, understory stem density returned to unburned levels by 2001 (postfire year 5) and was higher than unburned levels through 2010 (postfire year 14, Figure 3). Understory density on Eckrant and Real soils in postfire year 14 was only slightly less on burned than unburned transects. The overstory on all soils was almost eliminated by the first wildfire, at least initially (Figure 4). On Evant and Eckrant soils, overstory density returned to unburned levels by postfire year 5 and, at least on Evant soils, continued to increase. On the more mesic Real soils, overstory density was similar to unburned levels by postfire year 2 and had more than doubled by postfire year 4. Even though overstory density has recovered to (or increased over) unburned levels, basal area is still much lower than in the unburned areas (Evant: 3 m²/ha vs. 23 m²/ha; Eckrant: 1 m²/ha vs. 17 m²/ha; Real: 3 m²/ha vs. 18 m²/ha).

Stem density response in both the under- and overstory differed greatly between the first and second fires. On both Eckrant and Real soils, twice-burned understory density in 2009 (the summer after the second fire) was about three times as high as in 1996 (the summer after the first fire) (Figure 3). Density decreased in each of the following years, but, at least on Eckrant soils, remained higher than both once-burned and unburned density. Overstory density, on the other hand, recovered more slowly (Figure 4). Recovery after the second fire lagged about a year behind recovery after the first fire. Thus in 2011 (year 2 after the 2nd fire), twice-burned overstory stem density on Real soils was similar to once-burned density in 1997 (year 1 after the 1st fire). On Eckrant soils, no overstory stems were found in the first two summers after the second fire; density in 2011 (year 2 after the 2nd fire) was 85% lower than it had been in 1999 (year 2 after the 1st fire).

Most species present in unburned transects were also present in the postfire communities because the majority of woody species in these woodlands regenerate after fire by sprouting. Notable exceptions include Ashe juniper, which does not sprout; and Rooseveltweed and prairie sumac, which sprout but also colonize burned areas from seed. Although the dominant oak species have remained the same, the codominant Ashe juniper has recovered very slowly. In year 14 after the first fire, stem density was still less than 5% of that in unburned communities.

After the first wildfire, most species on all three soils types increased in density for the first three growing seasons (Evant: 65% of species; Eckrant: 43%; Real: 63%; Table 2), but their density later declined (Evant: 35%; Eckrant: 46%; Real: 32%). These are identified in table 2 as species that “peaked”. After the second wildfire, many species decreased in density for the first three growing seasons (Eckrant: 37%; Real: 44%). Bastard's oak density, for example, increased in the 3 summers after the first fire on Evant and Real soils but later declined (see appendix for species density graphs). After the second fire on Eckrant and Real soils, bastard oak density declined. Rooseveltweed density increased in the 3 summers after the first fire on all three soil types, although it was not present in 1996 on any soil (and is also absent from most unburned transects). In year 14 after the first fire, density in the once-burned areas had peaked on Eckrant and Real soils but was continuing to increase on Evant soils. Rooseveltweed is still absent from twice-burned areas. Chinaberrytree, the most common non-native woody species found in the study area, was usually absent from Evant and Eckrant soils. On Real soils, it increased after the first fire but was absent after the second. (It was present in only one of the twice-burned transects before the second fire.)

While most species' density in the once-burned areas returned to unburned levels in the 14 years studied, a few species still had much higher stem density than in unburned areas. On Evant soils, these species include cedar-elm, dewberry, eastern poison-ivy, possumhaw, Rooseveltweed, and saw greenbrier; on Eckrant soils, they include eastern poison-ivy, paleleaf yucca, and pricklypears; and on Real soils, they include paleleaf yucca, saw greenbrier, and sweet mountain grape. After the second wildfire, most species' density declined; notable exceptions include the pricklypears and saw greenbrier, which continued to increase in density, particularly on Eckrant soils.

Series of 3 line graphs - one for each soil type - showing the density of stems over time, relative to two wildfires.

Figure 3—Average understory (stems <1.8 m tall) stem density from once-burned (1996), twice-burned (1996 and 2009), and unburned transects. Data were not collected every year. No transects on Evant soils were burned in the second fire.

Series of three line graphs - one for each soil type - showing stem density of overstory plants over time, relative to two wildfires.

Figure 4—Average overstory (stems >1.8 m tall) stem density from once-burned (1996), twice-burned (1996 and 2009), and unburned transects. Data were not collected every year. No transects on Evant soils were burned in the second fire.

Table 4—Density response* after crown fires in oak-juniper woodlands on three soil types. Species responses for the 1st fire were analyzed for all years, and also for 1996 to 1998 (years 0-2). Species responses for the 2nd fire are analyzed for 2009 to 2011 (years 0-2).
SpeciesEvantEckrantReal
1st fire1st fire2nd fire1st fire
(all years)(years 0-2)(all years)(years 0-2)(years 0-2)(all years)(years 0-2)
algeritaincreasingabsent(absent)
Ashe juniperincreasingvariableincreasingincreasingabsentpeakincreasing
bastard oakpeakincreasingdecreasingvariabledecreasingpeakincreasing
black prairie cloverincreasingincreasingabsent
blackjack oakpeakincreasing
Buckley's oakvariableincreasingdipdecreasingdecreasingdecreasingdecreasing
Carolina buckthornincreasingvariable
cedar-elmvariableincreasingdipvariable(absent)peakincreasing
Chinaberrytreeincreasingincreasing
chinkapin oakvariablevariable
common hoptreevariablevariableabsentvariabledecreasing
dewberrypeakincreasingpeakincreasingvariablevariablevariable
eastern poison-ivypeakincreasingpeakincreasingdecreasingpeakincreasing
Eve’s necklacepodpeakvariablevariablevariableabsentvariableincreasing
evergreen sumacpeakdecreasingvariablevariableincreasing
gum bullyvariableincreasingvariableincreasingvariablepeakincreasing
Jersey teavariableincreasing
mescal beanpeakincreasingdecreasingpeakvariable
Mexican plumvariablevariable
mustang grapepeakincreasingpeakabsent
netleaf hackberryvariableincreasingdipvariablevariablevariableincreasing
plumspeakincreasingabsent
possumhawdipincreasingvariablevariablevariablepeakdecreasing
post oakdipdecreasing
prairie sumacpeakincreasingpeakincreasingdecreasingvariablevariable
pricklypearincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasingpeakincreasing
Rooseveltweedincreasingincreasingpeakincreasingabsentpeakincreasing
roughleaf dogwoodvariablevariable
rusty blackhawincreasingvariablevariabledecreasingvariableincreasingvariable
saw greenbrierincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasing
sevenleaf creeperpeakvariabledecreasingpeakincreasing
skunkbush sumacvariableincreasingpeakvariabledecreasingvariablevariable
sorrelvinevariablevariableabsent
Spanish grapepeakvariablepeakincreasing(absent)peakvariable
stretchberryvariablevariablevariablevariabledecreasingvariableincreasing
sweet mountain grapevariabledecreasingpeakdecreasingvariableincreasingincreasing
sycamoreleaf snowbellvariableincreasing
Texas ashvariableincreasingpeakvariabledecreasingvariableincreasing
Texas Hercules'-clubvariabledecreasingdecreasingdipincreasing
Texas live oakvariablevariablevariablevariablevariablevariablevariable
Texas mulberryvariableincreasing
Texas persimmonvariableincreasingincreasingincreasingincreasing
Texas redbudpeakdecreasingdecreasingvariableincreasing
walnutsincreasingincreasing
western white honeysucklepeakvariablepeakdecreasingvariablepeakincreasing
yuccavariableincreasingpeakincreasingdecreasingincreasingincreasing

*Response variables are defined as follows:

  • absent = Absent after fire (if in parentheses, that species was not found in the twice-burned transects even before the fire, but was found in other transects on that soil).
  • decreasing = Density decreases continuously.
  • dip = Density initially decreases and then increases.
  • increasing = Density increases continuously.
  • peak = Density increases and then later decreases.
  • — = Species not found on that soil type or is too uncommon to determine a response.
  • italics = Absent for first 1-2 years after fire.
  • bold = Species response after 2nd fire is opposite that after 1st fire (years 0-2).
Table 5—Species densities on different soil types immediately after fire (mean ± standard error).
SpeciesEvantEckrantReal
1st fire1st fire2nd fire1st fire2nd fire
algerita00
Ashe juniper0 L0 L0 L0 L0 L
bastard oak229±17224,320±4,52062,993±10,342 H*7,794±2,46930,286±7,682 H*
black prairie clover00
blackjack oak0 L
Buckley's oak967±6292,338±1,0185,943±1,58910,626±1,18629,039±7,215 H*
Carolina buckthorn129±65 L119±70 L
cedar-elm637±285329±23600 L0
Chinaberrytree00
chinkapin oak47±470
common hoptree17±17017±17109±109
dewberry33±23 L9±676±760210±210
eastern poison-ivy3,624±1,3072,415±51448,071±8,380 H*3,227±58528,161±4,852 H*
Eve’s necklacepod00000
evergreen sumac720±5121,157±442330±1802,753±1,364 H*
gum bully729±231529±159829±503748±1811,408±513
Jersey tea0197±197
mescal bean480±2614,536±1,348 H*1,207±5434,753±2,703
Mexican buckeye246±2062,307±1,786 H*209±831,169±584 *
Mexican plum010±10416±416
mustang grape5±5 L036±36
netleaf hackberry267±137494±231900±66270±425±5
plums00
possumhaw1,252±521271±199607±4211,029±4574,659±3,425
post oak3,196±1,442
prairie sumac1,390±299 H1,014±15320,243±2,679 H*1,925±58624,057±6,275 H*
pricklypear0 L0 L164±87 *0 L69±30 L
Rooseveltweed00000
roughleaf dogwood057±57
rusty blackhaw281±18287±45393±393415±253779±393
saw greenbrier3,429±1053646±2181,543±530740±1482,301±724 *
sevenleaf creeper2±2464±4640416±286
skunkbush sumac24±191,473±8268,400±2,977 H*1,453±7957,699±1,854 H*
sorrelvine00
Spanish grape5±5 L0 L097±59353±303
stretchberry181±105256±144693±49857±46951±470 H*
sweet mountain grape76±71370±146579±306581±1631,777±677 *
sycamoreleaf snowbell67±67914±914
Texas ash814±505 L2,246±590 L1,350±724 L1,990±4659,034±3,447 *
Texas Hercules'-club7±721±2100
Texas live oak1,886±1,4483,381±1,281836±836199±123343±337
Texas mulberry00
Texas persimmon114±6550±50152±87603±322
Texas redbud842±2435,186±1,838 H*877±2503,039±621
walnuts0 L0
western white honeysuckle57±3167±32214±10930±18769±455 *
yucca001,147±7540429±208 *

Symbols used are defined as follows:

  • H = Significantly higher than density in unburned transects (average of 2001, 2005, and 2010,
    not shown here).
  • L = Significantly lower than density in unburned transects.
  • * = Significantly higher after second fire than first fire (α = 0.05).
  • — = Species uncommon or not found on that soil type.
Photo of an opening in a woodland with oaks and junipers surrounding an open area with light colored soil and scattered brown grass clumps.
Photo Credit
Photo by C. Reemts, 20 August 2010, The Nature Conservancy.

Photo 1—Unburned bastard oak-Ashe juniper woodland on Eckrant soil.

Photo of an area of moderately low-statured woody plants, mostly green and some leafless, with an abundance of woody debris on the ground.
Photo Credit
Photo by C. Reemts, July 2005, The Nature Conservancy.

Photo 2—Once-burned bastard oak shrubland on Eckrant soil in 2005, 9 years after the first fire.

Photo of a burned shrubland showing no living vegetation and many blackened stems arising from blackened, ashy soil.
Photo Credit
Photo by C. Reemts, 1 May 2009, The Nature Conservancy.

Photo 3—The same site as Photo 2, less than 1 month following the second fire.

Photo of a shrubland, with widely spaced, low-statured shrubs with ample green foliage and a few leafless stems.
Photo Credit
Photo by C. Reemts, July 2011, The Nature Conservancy.

Photo 4—The same site as Photos 2 and 3, two years after the second fire.

Photo of a shrubland on slightly sloping terrain with many dead, leafless stems and many clumps of short, green foliage emerging from the rocky soil.
Photo Credit
Photo by C. Reemts, 25 June 2009, The Nature Conservancy.

Photo 5—View of twice-burned slope (Real soil) in June 2009 (2 months following the second fire).

Photo of a shrubland on a slope, with many dead, leafless stems emerging above relatively dense, green foliage growing below.
Photo Credit
Photo by C. Reemts, 13 July 2010, The Nature Conservancy.

Photo 6—View of twice-burned slope (Real soil) one year after the second fire.

Management Implications

The wildfires changed the structure of the burned woodlands much more than they changed the species composition. Relatively tall woodlands with mostly continuous canopy were converted into much shorter and more open shrublands. The major change in species composition is the absence of Ashe juniper after both wildfires. This change, however, is very important, because Ashe juniper is a critical habitat component for the federally endangered golden-cheeked warbler. Even 14 years after the first wildfire, burned areas are not suitable habitat. However, the federally endangered black-capped vireo uses short, open shrublands for its nesting habitat. On slopes (Real soils), burned areas are suitable black-capped vireo habitat for ~3 years after the fires, while sites on Evant and Eckrant soils can be used for much longer (at least up to 14 years).

The second wildfire did not further change species composition but did further alter vegetation structure. Initial density of understory stems was much higher after the second than after the first fire, perhaps because the reburned plants were smaller than before the first fire. Some species lose the ability to resprout after they reach a certain size, while sprouting ability decreases in many others. The somewhat lower fire intensity may also have contributed to the increased postfire sprouting. Because of the increased stem density, overstory basal area is recovering slightly more slowly from the second fire than from the first. Plants that invest energy into sprouting many stems have less energy to devote to growing large stems.

Historically, the vegetation in this area was likely a shifting mosaic of mature, rarely-burned woodlands and burned woodlands in varying stages of recovery from fire. Managing such a shifting mosaic is possible only in very large management units, because of the long recovery time for the mature woodlands. For this reason, wildfires should be suppressed in current golden-cheeked warbler habitat, especially in small patches where a single fire could destroy all available habitat. Overmature black-capped vireo habitat can be restored through prescribed fire or mechanical treatments. Where wildfire has created black-capped vireo habitat, these restoration practices can maintain it in a suitable successional stage.

Contact

Charlotte Reemts, Vegetation Ecologist, Fort Hood Project, The Nature Conservancy. Currently Research and Monitoring Ecologist, creemts@tnc.org.

Appendix

This Management Project Summary contains information on the following taxa. For further information, see this document for graphs showing the changes in density of selected species over time on each soil type, or search FEIS for individual Species Reviews.

Common nameScientific name
Cacti
pricklypearOpuntia spp.*
Grasses
composite dropseedSporobolus compositus
dropseedsSporobolus spp.
little bluestemSchizachyrium scoparium
rosette grassesDichanthelium spp.
Texas wintergrassNassella leucotricha
threeawnsAristida spp.
sideoats gramaBouteloua curtipendula
yellow bluestemBothriochloa ischaemum
Lianas
dewberryRubus spp.*
mustang grapeVitis mustangensis
eastern poison-ivyToxicodendron radicans
saw greenbrierSmilax bona-nox
sevenleaf creeperParthenocissus heptaphylla
sorrelvineCissus trifoliata
Spanish grapeVitis cinerea
sweet mountain grapeVitis monticola
western white honeysuckleLonicera albiflora
Shrubs
algeritaMahonia trifoliolata
black prairie cloverDalea frutescens
Carolina buckthornFrangula caroliniana
common hoptreePtelea trifoliata
evergreen sumacRhus virens
gum bullySideroxylonlanuginosum
Jersey teaCeanothus herbaceus
mescal beanSophora secundiflora
Mexican buckeyeUngnadia speciosa
Mexican plumPrunus mexicana
plumsPrunus spp.*
possumhawIlex decidua
prairie sumacRhus lanceolata
RooseveltweedBaccharis neglecta
roughleaf dogwoodCornus drummondii
rusty blackhawViburnum rufidulum
skunkbush sumacRhus trilobata
stretchberryForestiera pubescens
sycamoreleaf snowbellStyrax platanifolius subsp. platanifolius
Texas Hercules'-clubZanthoxylum hirsutum
Texas mulberryMorus microphylla
Texas persimmonDiospyros texana
Texas redbudCercis canadensis var. texensis
yuccaYucca spp.*
Trees
Ashe juniperJuniperus ashei
bastard oakQuercus sinuata var. breviloba
blackjack oakQuercus marilandica
Buckley's oakQuercus buckleyi
cedar-elmUlmus crassifolia
ChinaberrytreeMelia azedarach
chinkapin oakQuercus muehlenbergii
Eve's necklacepodStyphnolobium affine
netleaf hackberryCeltis reticulata
post oakQuercus stellata
Texas ashFraxinus texensis
Texas live oakQuercus fusiformis
walnutsJuglans spp.*
*Opuntia spp.: Mostly O. engelmannii var. lindheimeri, but also includes O. engelmannii var. linguiformis, O. macrorhiza, and O. phaeacantha. Grouped due to inconsistent identification of less common species.
*Rubus spp.: Mostly R. trivialis, but also includes R. aboriginum. Grouped due to inconsistent identification of R. aboriginum.
*Prunus spp.: Mostly P. munsoniana, but also includes P. umbellata.
*Yucca spp.: Mostly Y. pallida, but also includes Y. arkansana.
*Juglans spp.: Mostly J. major, but also includes J. nigra.

References

1. Barrett, S.; Havlina, D.; Jones, J.; Hann, W.; Frame, C.; Hamilton, D.; Schon, K.; Demeo, T.; Hutter, L.; Menakis, J. 2010. Interagency Fire Regime Condition Class Guidebook. Version 3.0, [Online]. In: Interagency Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior; The Nature Conservancy (Producers). Available: http://www.frcc.gov/ [2013, May 13]. [85876]

2. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2005. Reference condition modeling manual (Version 2.1), [Online]. In: LANDFIRE. Cooperative Agreement 04-CA-11132543-189. Boulder, CO: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior (Producers). 72 p. Available: http://www.landfire.gov/downloadfile.php?file=RA_Modeling_Manual_v2_1.pdf [2007, May 24]. [66741]

3. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2007. Rapid assessment reference condition models, [Online]. In: LANDFIRE. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab; U.S. Geological Survey; The Nature Conservancy (Producers). Available: http://www.landfire.gov/models_EW.php [2008, April 18] [66533]

4. Reemts, Charlotte M.; Hansen, Laura L. 2008. Slow recolonization of burned oak-juniper woodlands by Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei): ten years of succession after crown fire. Forest Ecology and Management. 255(3-4): 1057-1066. [69954]

5. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Western Region. 1992. Western Region Fire Monitoring Handbook. San Francisco, CA: U.S. Department of the Inerior, National Park Service, Western Region. 89 p. [86310]

Reemts, Charlotte. 2012. Response of woody species to crown fires in oak-juniper woodlands (Texas). In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/fire-studies/reemts-and-hansen-2012

Last updated May 19, 2026