Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, Port Orford-cedar
Duchac, Leila S., compiler. 2026. Species Brief: Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, Port Orford-cedar. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/species-briefs/chalaw
This Species Brief is a concise summary of the biological, ecological, and fire‑related characteristics of an individual species derived from a Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) Species Review.
| Attribute | Characteristic | Justification | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological characteristics | |||
| Life form | Tree | Port Orford-cedar is a large, long-lived coniferous tree growing in a cone or pyramid shape, typically 40 to 60 m tall. | FEIS: Botanical Description [1] |
| Typical lifespan | 201+ years | Port Orford-cedars can live for centuries. Mature stands frequently include trees over 400 or 500 years old, and the oldest known individuals are nearly 600 years old. | FEIS: Plant Growth and Mortality [1] |
| Life cycle | Perennial | Port Orford-cedar is a long-lived coniferous tree. | FEIS: Botanical Description; Plant Growth and Mortality [1] |
| Drought tolerance | Low | Port Orford-cedar has very little drought resistance and often occurs on landforms with a perennial source of water. | FEIS: Site Characteristics [1] |
| Rooting depth | Shallow | Port Orford-cedar roots are generally shallow, fibrous, and of small diameter. There is no taproot, only vertical sinkers extending down from the shallow root network near the soil surface. | FEIS: Botanical Description [1] |
| Bark thickness at maturity | Thick | Bark is thick (10-25 cm), fibrous, and ridged. In a comparison of 29 western conifers, Port Orford-cedar had thicker bark than all other species except giant sequoia and redwood. | FEIS: Botanical Description; Fire Adaptations [1] |
| Sheds low branches | Often | Large Port Orford-cedars growing in forested conditions can self-prune up to 46 m, protecting live branches and needles from surface fires. MoreTrees growing in open environments may not self-prune, and branches often bend downward to reach the ground. | FEIS: Fire Adaptations [1] |
| Reproduction and Regeneration | |||
| Adventitious buds | Yes, unspecified* | Port Orford-cedar generally does not reproduce vegetatively and does not resprout after injury or top-kill by fire. MoreIt may occasionally reproduce by layering in bogs, sand dunes, and some high-elevation forests when moisture availability is particularly high. | FEIS: Vegetative Reproduction and Regeneration; Immediate Fire Effects [1] |
| Time to reproductive maturity | 2-5 years*; 6-10 years; 11-20 years | Port Orford-cedar produces seeds annually beginning at roughly 5 to 20 years old. Seed production may peak around 100 years old. | FEIS: Seed Production and Predation [1] |
| Soil seed bank longevity | Transient (<1 year) | Port Orford-cedar has a transient seed bank. Most seeds are only viable for the first year after dispersal. | FEIS: Seed Banking [1] |
| Month(s) when seeds typically ripen | September; October; November* | Port Orford-cedar seed cones ripen through summer and seeds mature in fall. Cones open to release seeds in September or October through the following spring. | FEIS: Seasonal Development; Seed Dispersal [1] |
| Serotinous cones | No | Port Orford-cedar cones open at maturity to release seeds from fall through the following spring, with no fire-stimulated opening described. | FEIS: Seed Dispersal [1] |
| Seed dispersal mechanism | Gravity; Wind; Water | Port Orford-cedar seeds have small wings and are dispersed by gravity, wind, and water. They are not dispersed far by wind, but the wings appear to help them float in water. | FEIS: Seed Dispersal [1] |
| Seed dispersal distance | <100 m; 101 m-1 km* | Although Port Orford-cedar seeds have wings, they are not dispersed far by wind. Estimated dispersal distance into clearcuts ranges from 50 to 110 m, or one to three tree heights. | FEIS: Seed Dispersal [1] |
| Optimal conditions for seedling establishment | Bare soil*; Litter and/or duff; Shade; Sun | Port Orford-cedar seedlings can establish in shaded or open conditions, though rates may be higher in the open. MoreGermination may be higher on disturbed soils or where seeds are shallowly buried in litter. It establishes on various substrates, and one study found all seedlings growing on rotten wood. | FEIS: Seedling Establishment and Mortality; Germination [1] |
| Successional Status | |||
| Shade tolerance | Moderately shade tolerant | Port Orford-cedar is generally classified as moderately shade-tolerant and can regenerate under conditions ranging from shaded forest to open, recently burned areas. MoreShade tolerance may be highest for seedlings and decrease as trees mature. | FEIS: Shade Tolerance [1] |
| Successional status | Early; Mid; Late | Port Orford-cedar is generally considered an early establisher after clearcutting or fire and may be a dominant or codominant during all stages of succession. MoreIts relative abundance and dominance may change over time, depending on plant community and site characteristics. | FEIS: Succession [1] |
| Fire | |||
| Primary fire response(s) or adaptation(s) | Resist | Large Port Orford-cedar trees resist surface fire through thick, undulating bark, self-pruning of lower branches, and decay-resistant wood. MoreIt does not resprout after injury or top-kill, and postfire recruitment is limited by a transient seed bank and short dispersal distance. Seedlings and small trees are likely to be injured or killed by fire. | FEIS: Fire Adaptations; Immediate Fire Effects; Seed Banking; Plant Response to Fire [1] |
| Germination is fire stimulated | Rarely/No | Port Orford-cedar seeds typically germinate in spring, and warmer temperatures may trigger a burst of germination, but no heat- or smoke-cued germination is described. MoreOne experimental study found no survival of 89 germinants on burned litter after 1 year. | FEIS: Germination; Fire Adaptations [1] |
| Flowering/fruiting is fire stimulated | Insufficient information | The source does not provide explicit information about fire-stimulated flowering or fruiting. | FEIS [1] |
| Season when it is most sensitive to fire | Insufficient information | The source does not provide explicit information about seasonal differences in fire sensitivity for Port Orford-cedar. MorePostfire mortality likely depends on the degree of injury sustained, such as the amount of cambium killed or the percentage of crown scorch. | FEIS: Postfire Mortality [1] |
| Plant flammability | Medium | Compared to 28 western conifers, Port Orford-cedar's litter ranks relatively low for flame length and percentage consumed and mid-range for flame duration. MoreHowever, after logging, its needles remain on twigs that dry quickly and can ignite explosively when dry, and its slow decay can build heavy fuel loads. | FEIS: Fuel Characteristics [1] |
| Early colonizer/recolonizer of burned or disturbed sites | Sometimes* | Port Orford-cedar is classified as a colonizer after fire or logging, and seeds can germinate in the first postfire year. MoreHowever, seedling survival seems to be low, and its short dispersal distance limits establishment in large, high-severity burned patches where no mature trees survive. | FEIS: Fire Adaptations; Plant Response to Fire; Seedling Establishment and Mortality [1] |
| Effect of fire exclusion on population | Varies throughout habitat or range | Port Orford-cedar occurs in communities with varied historical fire regimes, so fire exclusion likely has different effects among them. MoreFor example, fire exclusion in fen communities can allow Port Orford-cedar to establish and spread into fens, but excluding fire from frequent-fire forests has densified stands and shifted them toward high-severity fire that is more likely to kill it. | FEIS: Plant Communities; Fire Regimes; Fire Management Considerations; Management Under a Changing Climate [1] |
| Is this species typically managed with prescribed fire? | Insufficient information | Information is not available on the use of prescribed fire in Port Orford-cedar stands, though it has been suggested as a possible treatment for managing the root pathogen Phytophthora lateralis. | FEIS: Fire Management Considerations [1] |
| Predominant historical fire frequency where it most commonly occurs | Frequent*; Mid-frequency*; Infrequent | Port Orford-cedar occurs in communities with a range of historical fire frequencies. MoreWhere it is most common (North Pacific forests), LANDFIRE models estimate historical mean fire intervals over 400 years. Elsewhere in its range, estimated fire intervals are much shorter, from 8 to 68 years. In drier forests with short estimated fire intervals, it mostly occurs in moist microsites, where fires may be less frequent than the surrounding area. | FEIS: Fire Regimes; Fuel Characteristics; 2020 LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings [1] |
| Predominant historical fire severity where it most commonly occurs | Low*; Mixed*; Replacement | Where it is most common (North Pacific forests), LANDFIRE models characterize historical fire regimes as replacement severity. MoreElsewhere in its range, models estimate that most fires were mostly low- or mixed-severity. In drier forests, Port Orford-cedar mostly occurs in streamsides and other moist microsites, where fires may be of lower severity than surrounding areas. | FEIS: Fire Regimes; Fuel Characteristics; 2020 LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings [1] |
| Predominant historical fire regime group where it most commonly occurs | 1*; 3*; 5 | Port Orford-cedar is most common in plant communities with historically infrequent, stand-replacing fire (group 5), but also occurs in areas with historically frequent low/mixed-severity fire (group 1) and moderately frequent, mostly mixed-severity fire (group 3). | FEIS: Fire Regimes; 2020 LANDFIRE Biophysical Settings [1] |
| Alters historical fuel characteristics of ecosystems where it occurs | Rarely/No | Port Orford-cedar is not described as altering fuel characteristics. MoreHowever, its wood is decay-resistant, so mortality agents—particularly the nonnative pathogen Phytophthora lateralis—may increase dead-wood volume, and its slow decay rate can build heavy fuel loads where fire is excluded or infrequent. Fire exclusion has altered fire regimes and forest structure across much of its range, but Port Orford-cedar density was not described as altering fuels. | FEIS: Fuel Characteristics; Fire Regimes [1] |
| Biophysical Setting | Mean Fire Interval (years) | Fire Severity Percent (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Code | Fire Regime Group | Low | Mixed | Replacement | All | Low | Mixed | Replacement |
| Series 10150 - California Coastal Redwood Forest | ||||||||
| 10150_2_3_4 | I-C | 32 | 408 | 30 | 93 | 0 | 7 | |
| Series 10280 - Mediterranean California Mesic Mixed Conifer Forest and Woodland | ||||||||
| 10280_2_3 | I-B | 25 | 47 | 237 | 15 | 61 | 33 | 6 |
| 10280_4_6_7_12 | I-C | 33 | 46 | 148 | 17 | 51 | 37 | 12 |
| Series 10320 - Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest | ||||||||
| 10320_2_3_7 | I-C | 58 | 58 | 189 | 25 | 43 | 43 | 14 |
| Series 10321 - Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest - Cascades | ||||||||
| 10321_6 | I-C | 58 | 176 | 149 | 34 | 58 | 19 | 23 |
| Series 10322 - Mediterranean California Red Fir Forest - Southern Sierra | ||||||||
| 10322_6 | III-A | 78 | 317 | 294 | 52 | 66 | 16 | 18 |
| Series 10210 - Klamath-Siskiyou Lower Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland | ||||||||
| 10210_2_3_6_7 | I-B | 11 | 70 | 229 | 9 | 82 | 13 | 5 |
| Series 10220 - Klamath-Siskiyou Upper Montane Serpentine Mixed Conifer Woodland | ||||||||
| 10220_2_3_6_7 | I-B | 11 | 70 | 231 | 9 | 82 | 13 | 5 |
| Series 10360 - North Pacific Hypermaritime Sitka Spruce Forest | ||||||||
| 10360_1_2 | V-B | 657 | 657 | 0 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Series 10390 - North Pacific Maritime Mesic-Wet Douglas-fir-Western Hemlock Forest | ||||||||
| 10390_1_2_3_7 | V-A | 404 | 404 | 0 | 0 | 100 | ||
| Summary | ||||||||
| Minimum | 11 | 46 | 148 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
| Maximum | 78 | 317 | 657 | 657 | 93 | 43 | 100 | |
| Mean | 38 | 112 | 295 | 125 | 54 | 17 | 29 | |
| Median | 33 | 70 | 234 | 28 | 60 | 15 | 13 | |
| Percentage of fires in 3 fire severity classes, derived from LANDFIRE succession modeling. Replacement-severity fires cause >75% kill or top-kill of the upper canopy layer; mixed-severity fires cause 26%-75%; low-severity fires cause <26%. | ||||||||
| LANDFIRE. 2020. Biophysical settings models and descriptions, [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Geological Survey; Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy, (Producers). Available: https://www.landfirereview.org/search.php [96496] | ||||||||
1. Duchac, Leila S. 2023. Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, Port Orford-cedar. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://research.fs.usda.gov/feis/species-reviews/chalaw