Download (PDF 3.46 MB): https://research.fs.usda.gov/download/treesearch/67379.pdf
Abstract
Understanding the forest carbon cycle has become increasingly important as carbon dioxide (CO
2) emissions contribute to the changing climate. Decomposition is a major component of the forest carbon cycle; however, aspects of wood decomposition remain poorly understood, especially for stumps. To fill this knowledge gap, we examined the change in CO
2 emissions over time from
Picea rubens Sarg. (red spruce) stumps using a 32-year chronosequence (i.e., 0, 2, 4, 8, 23, and 32 years since harvest) derived from detailed harvesting records in a northern conifer forest in central Maine, USA, that has experienced repeated partial harvests. We found low initial CO
2 flux (3.2 μmol CO
2 m
-2 s
-1 at year 0) followed by a rapid increase, peaking 8 years post-harvest (24.3 μmol CO
2 m
-2 s
-1) followed in turn by a decrease to very low rates by years 23 and 32 (1.4 and 1.7 μmol CO
2 m
-2 s
-1, respectively). We found no clear relationship between CO
2 emissions and any of the environmental or stump variables tested (wood temperature, wood moisture, soil moisture, and/or stump volume), suggesting that time since harvest was the overriding influence on CO
2 flux rates. The large variability in CO
2 flux rates among stumps of the same time since harvest points to the need for future research that includes larger sample sizes and covers a wider range of environmental and stump variables to better capture potential sources of variation. Our results add to the growing body of research on carbon emissions from deadwood that can inform forest carboncycle models. In addition, forest managers, who are increasingly interested in carbon management, can use these results to assess harvesting impacts on forest carbon emissions.
Citation
Read, Zoe; Fraver, Shawn; Forrester, Jodi A.; Wason, Jay; Woodall, Christopher W. 2022. Temporal trends in CO
2 emissions from
Picea rubens stumps: A chronosequence approach. Forest Ecology and Management. 524: 120528. 7 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120528.