Whitebark Pine - Daylighting Restoration Treatments
Whitebark pine populations are declining across their entire range due to the combined effects of mountain pine beetle, whitebark pine blister rust, and changing fire regimes. This species is important for ecosystem diversity as well as snowpack and soil retention in the high elevation sites. Efforts are underway to restore whitebark pine forests using a variety of mechanical thinning and prescribed burning techniques.
Silvicultural treatments and prescribed burning have been used to restore declining whitebark pine stands in many places. However, these techniques are costly and are somewhat difficult to implement on National Forests with limited budgets and resources. Alternative techniques need to be explored that are similarly effective to cutting and burning.
Daylighting treatments, where competing trees are cut in a circular area around a target leave tree, have had success in other five-needle pine ecosystems. Many managers now use daylighting for whitebark pine restoration as an alternative to thinning entire stands. These efforts aim to reduce competition around living whitebark pine trees to improve tree vigor and promote regeneration.
Prior to this project, no research documented the effects of daylighting treatments on whitebark pine survival, vigor, and cone production. We investigated the effects of daylighting treatments on wildland fuels, tree survival and mortality, and understory vegetation at four sites: Prospect Mountain (Lolo National Forest), Grouse Mountain (Bridger-Teton National Forest), Mink Peak (Lolo National Forest), and the Idaho-Montana Stateline (Idaho Panhandle National Forest). We found modest increases in diameter and height growth in whitebark pine that had been daylighted out to a 4-meter radius, but no difference in the 2-meter radius daylighting treatment.
Principal Investigator: Bob Keane
Funding Contributor(s): RMRS Fire, Fuel, and Smoke Science Program, and National Fire Plan
Project Years: 2008-2021

The locations of the two treatment units where trees were individually daylighted in this study. Map of unit locations with marked individual trees, Square Lake on left and Flattop further right.
At the Stateline study area, we evaluated increases in diameter and height over ten years (2008-2018) after two types of daylighting treatments (removing competition in a 2 m and 4 m radius around selected trees) on two units along the Idaho-Montana, USA divide. In 2008, 694 young whitebark pine trees, with a minimum height of 0.5 meters and a maximum DBH of 10 cm, and without visual sign of lethal blister rust cankers, were selected and tagged in two large areas on the Idaho Panhandle National Forest. 287 of the whitebark pine were tagged and treated as control trees, while 407 more were assigned either a 2-meter or 4-meter thinned radius, separated equally within 3 height classes. After the 2008 release treatments, re-measurements were taken in 2013 and 2018. To examine height and diameter increases and blister rust presence, we measured DBH, height, live crown percentage, blister rust %, and live canopy % of all treated and control trees.
We found that while there were increases in diameter (average of 1.2 cm for 2 m radii and 1.6 for 4 m radii) and height growth (an average of 0.03 m for 2 m radii and 0.04 m for 4 m radii) over the 10 years, daylighting around trees using a 2 m radius resulted in no significant increases in either height or diameter growth for individual whitebark pine trees when compared to untreated controls.
There were statistically significant differences in growth for trees in the 4 m radius treatment compared to the control, but these differences were small (an average of 0.05 cm for diameter; 0.001 m for height).
While selected trees in 2008 had no blister rust cankers on their boles and branches with blister rust were pruned, we found a significant increase in blister rust presence from 2013 to 2018 (~56% increase). However, the increase in blister rust presence was similar across trees in both treated areas and controls.

Average increases in diameter (cm) and height (m) over ten years when separated by height classes (0.5-1.4 m, 1.5-3 m, >3 m). There was no significant difference in ten-year growth among the height classes.

Growth of tagged trees DBH (cm) for the three measurement intervals across the two units (Flattop and Square Lake) and for the two units combined for each of the treatments (control, 2-meter radius, and 4-meter radius). It is apparent that trees daylighted to 4 m radius grew faster than trees in the control and 2 m daylight treatment.

Growth of tagged trees height (meters) for the three measurement intervals across the two units (Flattop and Square Lake) and for the two units combined for each of the treatments (control, 2-meter radius, and 4-meter radius). It is apparent that trees daylighted to 4 m radius grew faster than trees in the control and 2 m daylight treatment.
Key Personnel
Principal Investigator
-
Person
Robert E. Keane, PhD
Emeritus Scientisthttps://research.fs.usda.gov/about/people/robert.e.keane
Research Staff
-
Person
Sarah Flanary
Ecologisthttps://research.fs.usda.gov/about/people/sarah.j.flanary -
Person
Sharon M. Hood, PhD
Research Ecologisthttps://research.fs.usda.gov/about/people/sharon.hood -
Person
Violet Holley
Forest Technicianhttps://research.fs.usda.gov/about/people/vholley
Collaborators
Research Collaborators:
- Bruce Ericson, Superior Ranger District, Lolo National Forest
- Karl Buermeyer and Jhen Rawling, Blackrock Ranger District, Bridger-Teton National Forest
- Idaho-Panhandle National Forest
- Katharine Gray, California State University at Chico
Funding Contributor(s):
- USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station
- RMRS Fire, Fuel, and Smoke Science Program
- National Fire Plan