T
T
T

Aquatic Biodiversity

Status
Completed
Start Date
January, 2021

Biodiversity conservation requires understanding small- and large-scale patterns of biodiversity as well as understanding the potential for invasive species to disrupt native ecosystems. Biodiversity reflects geological history and long-term patterns of climate, such as ice ages, that altered population connectivity at continental and regional scales, often leading to different patterns of speciation and colonization.

High biodiversity is associated with resilience and ecosystem health. Globally, aquatic biodiversity is declining faster than either terrestrial or marine biodiversity. Invasive species, habitat loss, and habitat fragmentation are contributing to the decline.

By mapping distribution patterns of native and invasive species and linking these maps with threats from climate change and human development, we can identify areas that may be particularly vulnerable to different stressors. This work can be used to prioritize conservation actions at national, regional, and local scales.

Artwork showing a fish swimming above a crayfish and three mussels. The fish, a mountain redbelly dace, has a strong black stripe from its eye to the base of its tail, black spots on a pale gold back and sides, a bright red belly, and bright yellow pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins. The signal crayfish has an orange-rust body, light brown tail, warm brown legs, and large front claws with a white patch (the “signal”) at the joint.

Aquatic biodiversity is a critical element of national-scale environmental protection and planning. This study examined diversity of fishes, crayfish, and mussels in the lower 48 United States and mapped patterns of species richness and endangered species for these three groups of animals. Depicted are a mountain redbelly dace (Chrosomus oreas), a signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus), and shinyrayed pocketbook mussels (Hamiota subangulata). Illustration by Kathryn Ronnenberg, USDA Forest Service

We mapped patterns of aquatic biodiversity at regional and national scales to compare them with threats from climate change and land management. We also defined and mapped forest-associated fishes across the United States.

To facilitate aquatic invasive species monitoring at a regional scale, we developed multispecies eDNA field methods, laboratory analysis, and sample design. We then conducted a pilot project in large rivers, lakes and reservoirs on the east and west sides of the Cascade Range in Oregon to assess these newly developed field methods.

Map of the contiguous 48 United States, showing the number of fish, crayfish, and mussel species combined. The greatest number of species is found in the Eastern and Southeastern United States, peaking in the Mississippi and Ohio River watersheds, from Arkansas and Alabama in the south to Wisconsin and Ohio to the north, including the Ozarks and the Appalachians, with as many as 284 species combined across the three taxonomic groups. Three smaller maps below separate the groups.

Aquatic biodiversity is a critical element of national-scale environmental protection and planning. The Southeastern United States is a global hotspot for aquatic biodiversity.

The Southeastern United States has the highest aquatic biodiversity across the conterminous 48 states. This region is a global biodiversity hotspot, particularly for crayfish and mussels but also for salamanders and turtles, which were not considered in our work. Imperiled aquatic species follow broader patterns of aquatic biota, with greater numbers of species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act occurring in the Southeast and Pacific Northwest.

Map of the contiguous 48 United States, showing the number of endangered fish, crayfish, and mussel species. Higher numbers of endangered aquatic species are found in the Lower Columbia River watersheds of the Pacific Northwest, the central Rocky Mountains of eastern Utah and western Colorado, in and central Arizona. However, the highest numbers of endangered aquatic species occur in the Eastern and Southeastern United States, with numbers peaking in Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama.

The number of fish, crayfish, and freshwater mussel species listed under the Endangered Species Act by watershed across the conterminous United States.

Biodiversity of forest-associated fishes is greatest east of the Mississippi River.

Three maps of the conterminous 48 United States show fish species richness by watershed (hydrologic unit code 8) , with darker shades symbolizing more species. Part A, upper left: Fish species associated with areas having relatively low forest cover (26 to 50 percent) span the center of the United States, focused on the Mississippi River and its tributaries.

Forest-associated fish species richness by watershed (hydrologic unit code 8), with darker shades symbolizing more species. (A) Fish species associated with areas having relatively low forest cover (26 to 50 percent). (B) Fish species associated with areas having moderate to high forest cover (51 to 75 percent). (C) Fish species that have more than three-quarters of their distribution in watersheds with very high forest cover (76 to 100 percent). Figure from Bury et al. (2021).

Environmental DNA Results: We developed field and laboratory methods for detecting plant and animal DNA from the same water sample. Primers were developed for 20 invasive taxa of particular interest to the Pacific Northwest Region of the USDA Forest Service. We found that field sampling successfully detected invasive plants and animals, thus providing a new method that can be applied across the region to detect invasive aquatic species much earlier than previously possible.

Focusing on forest-associated aquatic biodiversity provides foundational information for national- and local-scale planning for protection and conservation of biota.

Theoretical and applied work on aquatic biodiversity leverages emerging technology directly relevant to long-term monitoring and adaptive management. Multispecies environmental DNA field and laboratory methods for aquatic invasive species directly support the development and implementation of monitoring applications at a regional scale. Early detection allows for early eradication of aquatic invasive species. To intercept invasive species before they are fully established, sensitive environmental DNA samples can be taken to provide a foundation for monitoring that facilitates early detection and a rapid response.

Two photos showing field sampling for environmental DNA. The photo on the left shows two technicians standing at the riverside processing liter-sized samples of water through filters to capture DNA from aquatic organisms. The photo on the right is a closeup photo showing a technician handling a sample filter with gloves to prevent contamination.

Technicians filter water samples from Cow Creek, Oregon, to capture DNA from aquatic organisms. The DNA-laden filters were later processed in a laboratory to identify which species were present in the river. Figure from Flitcroft et al. (2018).

Key Personnel

Staff

  • Person

    Rebecca Flitcroft, PhD

    Research Fish Biologist
  • Person

    Brooke Penaluna

    Research Fisheries Biologist
  • Person

    Laura Hauck, PhD

    eDNA Ecologist/Molecular Biology Laboratory Manager
  • Person

    Richard Cronn, PhD

    Research Geneticist
  • Person

    Jay Munyon

    Biological Scientist

Collaborators

  • Gwendolynn Bury (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education)

  • U.S. Geological Survey

  • USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region

  • Oregon State University

Publications

Other Publications

    • Flitcroft, R.; Penaluna, B.; Capurso, J.; Hansen, B.; Cronn. R.; McKay, D. 2018. Pilot study for multiple aquatic invasive species monitoring. Stream Notes. August 2018. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, National Stream and Aquatic Ecology Center. 
    • Flitcroft, R.L. 2018. Seasonal fish abundance at tide-gate locations in the Coos River Estuary. Piscatorial Press Newsletter of the Oregon Chapter, American Fisheries Society. Summer 2018. p. 6.
Last updated January 19, 2024